• My Transition From Focusing on Me to Focusing on Others

    Let's look at a familiar passage on transformation:

    So we tell others about Christ, warning everyone and teaching everyone with all the wisdom God has given us. We want to present them to God, perfect in their relationship to Christ. That's why I work and struggle so hard, depending on Christ's mighty power that works within me.[1]

    The words that jump off the page at me are "present them to God." One of Paul's great strengths as a leader was that he considered people's attitude and conduct the central focus of his work; he was an artist presenting his work to God. Paul was clear: Leaders are to grow from being focused on how they are feeling and doing to being focused on how to lead their followers to maturity. According to him, the task of bringing others to spiritual maturity requires hard work, work that God alone is able to do through us.

    I am not sure exactly when I became focused on others. Many experiences played a role. One watershed moment was the day I sat down with one of my sons and asked, "How did you experience me as a father?" He told me that he learned right and wrong from me, that I was a good model of a Christian father, but that we weren't very close. What he meant was that we didn't have a lot of common interests. His answer shook me. It told me what I had to own up to: I had related to my son as if he were a project, just like my other projects. For me, being a good father was a duty, a goal to check off my list. I was more interested in making sure my son turned out "good" than I was in enjoying him. This conversation didn't take place until I was fifty years old; it causes me to wince as I write.

    The transition of learning to focus on others instead of ourselves is treacherous emotionally because it requires that we own our influence on others. It causes us to ask: If the people around me are afraid, am I afraid? Am I acting in a way that causes them to be afraid? If they are sour of spirit, did I create it? If they are positive, was I the model?

    I saw with my son that I needed a new way to evaluate my life and impact. Christian leaders also need new standards of measurement for gauging our success. I like the metrics that Harvard University professor Dr. Clayton M. Christensen recommends. He teaches a course on humility and has his students ask themselves three questions: 

    1. How can I be sure that I will be happy in my career? 

    2. How can I be sure that my relationships with my spouse and my family become an enduring source of happiness? 

    3. How can I be sure I'll stay out of jail?[2]

    The last question is not frivolous for a graduate of Harvard Business School or for any leader. Professor Christensen suggests that leaders take one hour per day reading, thinking, and praying about why God put them on this earth. He credits this habit in the middle of his heavy schedule as a Rhodes scholar as the reason he figured out the purpose of his life.

    Your true purpose dictates what you measure to determine whether you are successful. For example, early in my ministry my stated purpose was to reach the world for Christ, but what I measured was church attendance. My true purpose was a larger congregation, not reaching the world for Christ. By changing the world, I meant making disciples who reproduce, but my measurable goal was putting more people in the seats via my preaching.

    Church size is not the optimum metric for Christian leaders; the standard needs to be mature followers of Christ who act like Christ Monday through Saturday in the ordinary places of life (as well as on Sunday!). This does not mean, however, that pastors of large churches or captains of industry are not following the right metrics; size is incidental and is more a product of talent, personality, circumstances, innovation, and skill. Actually, those who lack recognition are most desperate for it and most susceptible to such a temptation.

    Paul was able to define what made him happy: when the people he influenced and taught were mature followers of Christ, when they lived and worked together in harmony and were Christlike in the world.[3] If Christian leaders measure those things, it won't make our work easier, but it will make it different. We are then committed to quality of persons, rather than quantity.

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.


    1. Clayton M. Christensen, "How Will You Measure Your Life?" Harvard Business Review, July/August 2010, 46-51.
    2. See Colossians 1:28-29; Galatians 4:19-20; Ephesians 4:11-17.
    3. Christensen, 48.
  • My Transition From Seeking Recognition to Learning to Act Caringly

    I was a new pastor, about one year into it, and some people in the congregation started complaining that I was cold, uncaring, and aloof. The truth was that I was shy, socially awkward, and tall. I was also driven to succeed, to make things happen, and I had the theology to back it up: "We are to be and make disciples," beginning in our home area and working our way out to the world (Matthew 28:18-20). I believed that everything else was a sideshow, a waste of time—what Pascal called "licking the earth."[1]

    One of my favorite sayings was, "Discipleship is the name of the game; it's the only game in town. If you are here for any other reason, I am not sure why you are here. We are not here for the music; we are not here to socialize; we are not here to see our friends; we are here to get trained, equipped. You are soldiers, warriors. Otherwise, stay home, play golf, watch TV, putter around in your garage. Don't waste your time here." I am sure there was a mean look on my red face and that people were slumping in their chairs, trying not to get burned by my fiery darts.

    The complaints spread, and I went to my superintendent to find out what to do. I told him about the progress that was being made but that some in the church were unhappy with me. He said, "I know about the complaints. I have had several calls." He saw that I was angry and said, "Bill, they are just afraid that you might push them right out of the church. They don't think you care about them." He went on to explain what I should do: "Next week when you complete your sermon, tell the congregation that you know that some believe you are cold, uncaring, and aloof. Ask them to help you learn to love and to communicate how you really feel toward others." 

    I was appalled. 

    "I can't say that! They will think I have a problem," I sputtered. He looked at me with a smile and said, "Bill, they already know you have a problem. I promise you that if you tell them you are sorry and that you want their help, they will come out of the woodwork to affirm you."

    So that Sunday I did as he recommended. I even said, "Would you help me learn to love?" 

    My mentor was a prophet. The congregation embraced me. For the next few years, the church coached me in good humor about how to act caringly. It was a turning point because they helped me and I was better able to help them. How? By trusting that God would work in them and by recognizing that they wanted what I wanted, a vibrant life in Christ. I found freedom in understanding that they would not necessarily go about it the same way I would.

    Here's a case in point: One day I asked a church member to go door-to-door with me in the neighborhood, and we visited a man who was unusually rude. He answered the door and said, "What?" obviously annoyed by our presence. I introduced ourselves and said that we were so glad his wife had visited our church the previous Sunday. He shot back, "Look, I don't care what my wife did. I don't need any of that!" After a few more choice words, he slammed the door in our faces. This encounter was not what the church member wanted or expected. He was shaken. I needed to realize that sheep normally don't go to war; they don't do daring things. I had to rethink how I might help them.

    I am still learning how to love and care for others. It is a daily quest rooted in the soil of everyday life. Will I empty the dishwasher for my wife? Will I invite to lunch a lonely person who can't help me in any way? Yes, this transition is long, but there are milestones, those moments we remember when something important changed.

    [1] Malcolm Muggeridge, A Third Testament (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2004), xiii

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.

    Photo by Ben White on Unsplash

  • What Makes a Leader Happy?

    As a young leader, I wanted those I led to work on whatever I put in their minds, and I wanted them to succeed in our projects so that I would get my needs met. I hadn't claimed the world as my oyster, but certainly the church was. It was mine to consume and use to meet my need for significance. Did I know this? Of course not. I would have laughed at you if you had suggested it. I would have denied it and would not have believed it.

    After all, I was committed to evangelism; I organized outreach events and provided training for church members. My church was very successful. We attracted many seekers and many made decisions to follow Christ. I encouraged our people to be mindful about whom they talked to and invited to our events. I recommended that they work only with those who were candidates to attend our church. I didn't think it did much good to lead people to Christ who would attend another church. I had attendance goals I wanted to reach.

    If I was not seeing enough progress numerically, an inner pressure would build inside me over time. This would invariably lead to a passionate burst of emotion and a "get with the program" type of sermon. In one of my "best" I said something like, "I don't know about you, but I am tired of playing church. I want to see some new Christians around here. If you are as fed up as I am with dinking around, meet me this afternoon at two o'clock, and we will go door to door in this community for Christ." I went home and after lunch I asked my wife, Jane, if she was going with me to the church to do the door-to-door thing. She looked at me with a little smile. "No, I would rather have my arms amputated," she said. In the end, I don't think even I went. She convinced me that no one would show up.

    I cared about people, I was sincere, and I was highly motivated for Christ. I had lofty hopes and dreams. Like Thor Heyerdahl standing gallantly on the bow of his raft Kon-Tiki, I stared out to sea with a confident smirk, knowing that just over the horizon were great opportunities, more adventure, and worlds to conquer. Heyerdahl could not swim; neither did I appreciate the peril I was in. I was happy when those I respected noticed and affirmed me as a leader. (That still makes me happy, by the way.) 

    Today, however, the primary source of my happiness as a leader is similar to Paul's, who told the church at Philippi: "Then make me truly happy by agreeing wholeheartedly with each other, loving one another, and working together with one mind and purpose" (Philippians 2:2).

    Paul prefaced this statement by saying, "Is there is any encouragement from belonging to Christ? Any comfort from his love? Any fellowship together in the Spirit? Are your hearts tender and compassionate?" (Philippians 2:1).

    In other words, it made Paul happy when those around his followers could see that being a disciple was useful for life. He found his greatest joy in other people's success. I feel the same.

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.

    Photo by Lotte Meijer on Unsplash

  • To Reach or To Change the World?

    I heard a sermon recently that called Christians to change the world, to take it over in the power and authority of Jesus. I don't believe this is our calling, responsibility, or the purpose of the Great Commission. In fact, Andy Crouch in his book Culture Making pointed out that "changing the world" talk is relatively new to Christian literature. He and Nate Barksdale searched the Harvard University library system for all books and titles that included the phrases "change the world," "changing the world" or "changed the world." There were 216 results; seventy-five were published after 2000. Another 101 were published in the previous decade. Eighteen were published in the 1980s, four in the 1970s, eight in the 1960s, and four in the 1950s. A total of six were published in the fifty years before that. Crouch delivered the punch line: "Of the 1.5 million titles in the Harvard collections published before 1900, how many included a reference to changing the world? Zero."[1]

    There are a number of ways to draw meaning from such studies. I suppose one could conclude that because we think more globally today, global matters are of a greater concern. We know more about hunger, disease, and war around the world, and it is easier to publish our thoughts; everyone can be a writer via social networks available to anyone who cares to comment. The other factor is hubris. Because we know about the world, we are more likely to think we can change it.

    The world is harder to change than most religious leaders think. In his excellent work on the Crusades, God's Battalions, sociologist Rodney Stark pointed out how long it took for a conquered nation to thoroughly change its religion. He found that it took an average of two hundred fifty years for a Christian nation to become a 50 percent Muslim nation.[2] This is apparent when one drives through Istanbul, Turkey. It was once the center of the Christian world, but now minarets of Islamic mosques dominate the skyline. The same is true of many other Muslim countries. These countries did not change because of missionary work or proselytizing. They changed because war and conquest forced a new religion and way of life on them, but it took on average more than two centuries for each country to change from an official Muslim country to a genuine Muslim country, where most of the general populace practiced the religion.

    The New Testament calls Christians not to military conquest, but to a divine conspiracy of disciples making other disciples. We are told: "And the Good News about the Kingdom will be preached throughout the whole world, so that all nations will hear it; and then the end will come."[3] The end that Jesus spoke of is the return of Christ, and it will trigger the kind of actions that will truly change the world into a semi-paradise.[4] In the meantime, Christ's followers are charged to be disciples, to make other disciples, to love one another and love the world—that is all we need to do. The church's calling is to send a transformed people into the living spaces of society and to establish a presence: the presence of Christ in every facet of a community.


    [1] Andy Crouch, Culture Making: Recovering Our Creative Calling (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2008), 188.

    [27] Rodney Stark, God's Battalions (San Francisco: HarperOne, 2009), 32.

    [28] Matthew 24:14.

    [29] Heaven as described in Revelation 21.

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.

  • Will It Really Make a Difference?

    The following is an excerpt from my book, The Christian Leader.

    Perhaps you are wondering whether it will make a difference if we as Christian leaders change our thoughts and behavior about how to lead. The answer is determined by the goal. If by rehabilitated leaders we mean rehabilitated pastors, then the objective is narrowed to local congregations. The answer would be yes—pastors with new ways of thinking and behaving can change the ethos of their congregations. In fact, pastors are the single best hope for setting into motion the movement that will spur the church to accomplish what it should: to make disciples of all people.[1] Churches are to be outposts in the larger world, the places where Christians are taught and trained so they can be useful in making disciples.

    The church and its leaders have always been on the margins of society, not at the cultural center. The president of a Christian denomination does not have the same societal influence as the president of Harvard or Stanford. An article in the New York Times or Wall Street Journal is more widely distributed than the same in the Moline Dispatch. Because of this, some think that the church should be intentional about reaching leaders who have cultural influence, that cultural elites make the important decisions about government and major educational and cultural institutions, and that the only way Christians can change society is to convert the leaders who count. But will such a strategy work, and is it the one that Christian leaders are commissioned to undertake? I don't believe so. The genius of God's method of bringing people into his kingdom is that we don't get to be part of the selection committee. God is at work in many a person's heart, both before and after a decision to follow Christ.

    Dallas Willard spoke to this in a way that can startle the contemporary mind-set:

    Ministers pay far too much attention to people who do not come to services. Those people should, generally, be given exactly that disregard by the pastor that they gave to Christ. The Christian leader has something much more important to do than pursue the godless. The leader's task is to equip saints until they are like Christ (Eph. 4:1 2), and history and the God of history waits for him to do this job.[2]

    Every church has two categories of leaders. The first are pastors and teachers, whose primary role is to equip people for ministry. The second are leaders whose primary venue is the workplace and in the community. If the first set does its job, those in the second group can do theirs. Church leaders are called to train and deploy the entire congregation, regardless of gifts or status, so that they infiltrate society and live and work with those who need Christ. Our goal is to fill the culture with people who exhibit the character of Christ and influence people the way Jesus did.


    [1] For a treatment of the importance of pastors as teachers to the nations, see Dallas Willard's Knowing Christ Today, chapter 8, "Pastors as Teachers of the Nations," 193.

    [2] Dallas Willard, The Spirit of the Disciplines (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1988), 246.

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.

    Photo by William White on Unsplash

  • Leading as Jesus Did

    Consider the contrast between the way Herod led and the way Jesus led. Herod lived for himself, Jesus lived for others. Herod derived his influence via power and terror. He had his wife and two sons killed to consolidate power. His behavior prompted Caesar Augustus to say, "I would rather be Herod's pig than his son."[20] Jesus' influence, however, was based on his character and on his living out the tenets he taught in the Sermon on the Mount. His influence was his personal power, which he presented as a result of his special connection to his Father.[21]

    The challenge for the Christian leader is to find the same balance Jesus found. He had enough ambition to carry out his mission and enough humility to stay in submission to his Father. He knew when to back off, when not to take the bait or go for the shortcut that would abort his mission. Satan tried to get him to abandon his path to the cross; so did Peter, so did the Jewish leaders, and so did his own humanness. History would turn on his decisions; Jesus did it his own way, unlike most Christian leaders today. Jesus said he was the way, the truth, and the life.[22] Indeed, he had a way of leading; his way was the means by which he conducted his life and how he treated people.

    I might add that Jesus crammed a lot into a little over three years of public ministry—less than one U.S. presidential term. He wasn't in a hurry; he wasn't racked with anxiety, and his ambitions didn't conform to the political or religious climate. Yet, he became the centerpiece of human history. He has billions of followers, and the Book written about him remains the number-one best seller of all time. He leads the world's largest organization. I think we should pay attention to how he did it. His way was personal and ran contrary to the dominant leadership model. "We cannot use impersonal means to do or say a personal thing—and the gospel is personal or it is nothing," Eugene Peterson wrote.[23] Christ was willing to sacrifice the immediate spoils of success to get long-term results. He left with eleven followers, but now he has billions. Very few leaders are willing to make that kind of sacrifice, but we must if we are to be like Jesus.


    [20] Frederick Dale Bruner, Matthew: The Christbook, Matthew 1-12 (Waco, TX: Word, 1987), 50, quoted in Eugene Peterson, The Jesus Way: A Conversation on the Ways That Jesus Is the Way (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007), 201.
    [21] I speak here of his ability to heal, raise the dead, demonstrate dominance over evil spirits, and know what people were thinking in that he read their minds. See John 2:22. See also his discourses in John 5:19-30 and 17:1-26 on how his Father and he worked together on what to do and when to do it.
    [22] See John 14:6.
    [23] Peterson, 2.

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.

    Photo by Milada Vigerova on Unsplash

  • Knowledge and Trusting Jesus for Leadership

    Over the last fifty years, our perception of the nature of knowledge has changed. Religious knowledge about the soul is no longer on the same level as knowledge about the solar system or genetics. Scientists and other scholars often limit knowledge to what can be proved in a scientific laboratory.[1] Knowledge gained in controlled environments is considered higher and firmer than the knowledge of persons. This split in knowledge is a Faustian deal for the religious world. The university and other societal keepers of knowledge have said, "We will take knowledge," and told the church, "You take faith." And by obediently stepping aside, we Christians have sold our collective soul for a place, albeit a benign place, at the table. It is the chaplain's syndrome—the religious "expert" asked to open or close meetings with prayer or priest on the team sideline who is little more than a good-luck charm.

    Clearly, it is not the non-Christian world alone that needs to be convinced that Jesus is competent as a world-class leader; Christians also need convincing. There is a great gulf between honoring Jesus as God and Savior of the world and seeing him as someone who is competent to help with tough decisions. I see this split in a good friend of mine who is a judge. His first prayer in the courtroom as a Christian lawyer was I love you, Lord, but I would appreciate it if you would just stay out of this legal proceeding. I've got this. My friend's attitude is common. Many Christians think that Jesus is qualified to help them in their spiritual lives, but question whether he understands or would even bother to take an interest in the rest of their lives, whether in a courtroom or office or kitchen. Peter had to make this decision when Jesus asked him to cast the fishing nets out again after he and his fellow fishermen had failed to catch any fish all night long. Peter decided that this out-of-work carpenter had knowledge about fishing because of who he was (see John 21:4-9). Jesus had capacities that made him an expert on everything.

    The question for the church and its people is this: Are we going to settle for marginalization and allow Jesus to live in the margins with us? Let's not forget that Jesus can be marginalized only in his official capacity as the head of the visible church; he will insist on continuing his work among world leaders, even if he must do so unaccompanied by his own people. Let's follow him into the fray and learn from him about how to lead others. After all, Jesus is the only person who can be completely trusted and followed as a leader.

    [1] It is worth saying that science is not fixed knowledge; it continues to grow, and new findings often disprove some previous theory. There is little said about the limits of scientific knowledge. Charles Darwin said that scientific observation's purpose is to test a theory. Science is a theory that is tested and a certain knowledge is attained. This kind of "truth" changes. Religious knowledge is proved in a different way but can be just as true and more unchangeable. There are different ways of knowing and different kinds of knowledge.

    Photo by Ben White on Unsplash

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.

  • Introducing "The Christian Leader"

    Years ago I wrote a book called, The Christian Leader, and at the top of this year, I wanted to introduce this book to you by providing the introduction from the book here (with the permission of the publisher).

    I will be posting excerpts from this book on The Bonhoeffer Project blog throughout 2018, because I think the message is as relevant today as it was when I wrote it.

    Introducing The Christian Leader:

    Beside my desk, on my desk, on the bookshelves that surround me are more than seventy-five books on leadership. Over the last year I have read them, scribbled in their margins, underlined passages, and typed what I liked into my research notes. I am not even counting the hundreds of biographies of leaders I have read over the years: evil Mao, funny Mo Udall, confused John Lennon, good John Stott, great Winston Churchill, and mysterious Carl Jung. I have toughed my way through book summaries, YouTube seminars, and personal interviews. I have attended so many seminars on leadership that I can't remember them all. I have led and I have been led. I have a lot of information on leadership theory, skills, and personalities. I have taken the leadership profile assessments, I have given them to others, and I have been through the charts, graphs, and all the "twenty-six ways to be a leader" type of stuff.

    Most leadership literature talks about a "right kind" of leadership personality. You know the type: big-picture visionaries who serve others and get the best out of people. They suck all the oxygen out of a room when they enter and their big smiles reveal their artificially whitened teeth. They are exciting speakers who move their followers to tears or laughter, as desired.

    The question that has nagged me is this: Did Jesus fit the successful leadership profile? From everything I know about him, he didn't, nor does he intend or expect that any of us fit the profile. I am writing this book because I believe we need to change how the church views Christian leadership. We have paid homage to a secular model. We have secularized Christian leadership. Actually, we need to change the way Christians practice leadership. 

    The word secular comes from the Latin saecularis, which means "this present world." Its synonyms are nonreligious, profane, temporal—words associated with humanism, which puts man at the center. It is a worldview that puts God in the margin; he is brought in only to bless humankind's best efforts to achieve. Sadly, many Christian leaders today do not take Jesus seriously when it comes to getting things done in our churches, ministries, and organizations. They look to him for how to pray and what to believe about God, but they don't look to him as a model for how to be a leader. They seem more determined to be like successful secular leaders rather than distinctly Christian in their influence of others. As the late John Stott pointed out, "Leadership is a word shared by Christians and non-Christians alike, but this does not mean that their concept of it is the same."[1] No wonder we have lost the culture.

    This is not a book about improving Christian organizations; it is about changing how Christians lead. It is about how rehabilitated leaders change everything they touch. It is for anyone with a megaphone, a platform to speak, who wants to lead others in being a witness for truth. It is for people with a pulpit, whether that pulpit be a business or a position of influence in a domain of the culture: entertainment, sports, politics, industry, the arts, academia, or religion. If you are someone to whom others listen, you have a pulpit—and this book is for you.

    I will make my case for Jesus as more than whom God revealed in the Incarnation and the resurrected King of kings and Lord of lords, but additionally as our leader, and our model for any leading that is to be done in his name. I find Jesus fascinating. He was the smartest, most effective leader in history, and yet he didn't seem to try to be a leader, nor did he formally teach others about leadership. He did, however, teach his students to teach others.[2] In this book we will explore how Jesus' style of leadership leads to sacrifice, humility, and suffering. His disciples labored more than three hundred years in obscurity before achieving a level of power that we today would recognize as important.[3] Jesus had a message and he set his course to deliver it, no matter what. He was a natural leader; he had followers because he influenced people from his person, his innate character. Contemporary leaders don't do this much.

    Most contemporary Christians believe that being noticed in the secular and Christian press is critical to success. It's not that people would state such a belief, but one only has to listen to the excitement generated when some Christian effort is promoted in the press. It is exciting to be noticed, and it is normal to direct any future behavior to getting more notice. After several successful forays into this method of doing what works and getting rewarded, we are hooked. In time, a leadership character is developed in persons, institutions, and finally in cultures.

    This pattern of doing what works and getting rewarded is the enemy of Christian leadership. It thrives on making Christian work impersonal and exploitive. It serves the leader rather than those the leader leads. Sadly, this pattern dominates Christian leadership in the West. It is so powerful that its flow is pulling us all along and sometimes even under.

    I propose that we need a different style of leadership—one patterned after Jesus. We need to learn to influence others out of our character; that is what Jesus did. He taught us that the key to world revolution is to be yourself in the normal and common parts of life. If this sounds too theoretical for you, let the words of Dallas Willard help you and give you the courage to believe that it can actually be done:

    If [Jesus] were to come today as he did then, he could carry out his mission through most any decent and useful occupation. He could be a clerk or accountant in a hardware store, a computer repairman, a banker, an editor, doctor, waiter, teacher, farmhand, lab technician, or construction worker. He could run a house-cleaning service or repair automobiles. In other words, if he were to come today he could very well do what you do. He could very well live in your apartment or house, hold down your job, have your education and life prospects, and live within your family, surroundings, and time. None of this would be the least hindrance to the eternal kind of life that was his by nature and becomes available to us through him. Our human life, it turns out, is not destroyed by God's life but is fulfilled in it and in it alone.[4]

    Jesus influenced others because of who he was, not because he was well-known or a person of power or because he had

    mastered a set of skills or implemented an effective leadership strategy. He could have completed his mission living in your house, driving your car, married to your spouse, working at your office, and raising your kids because leadership comes down to character. Many who aspire to leadership are looking for the right circumstances so they can lead. Many in positions of leadership find it difficult to lead because of obstacles, such as a lack of funds, authority, and or confusion about methods. Jesus faced all of these—and more—yet he accomplished his mission. He said, "Take my yoke upon you. Let me teach you, because I am humble and gentle at heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy to bear, and the burden I give you is light."[5] Any leader who submits to him and learns from him what it means to lead will be able to lead.

    Many have deconstructed the divinity of Christ, the veracity of Christ, the teachings of Christ, and the claims of Christ. I am calling for the deconstruction of the irrelevancy of Christ as a leader. I am calling for the rehabilitation of the Christian leader. Think of reading this work as going into rehab. Rehab normally requires leaving normal routine and committing oneself to a new environment. In this case, you will need to provide your own way of withdrawing from society. It all begins in the mind. The belief that you can feel your way into change is false and dangerous. Knowledge is the starting point. Knowledge in this case is used more broadly than the stimulation of the intellect. It is what we might call an experiential knowing. You begin by reading, then you ponder and meditate on the principles and examples, and then train yourself to think and act differently.

    We will learn from Jesus, my personal story, and the examples of numerous leaders such as Winston Churchill and the first-century historian Josephus how to lead and how not to lead.

    Underlying it all is the firm foundation of Jesus and his example found in Scripture. Each chapter begins with a title and statement about Jesus' life that will be familiar to many. Regardless of where the book takes you, you will not be far from Christ himself. Jesus was a different kind of teacher. He spoke with a natural authority; it was the nature of his knowledge that set him apart. The Pharisees focused on doing the right thing. Jesus emphasized becoming the kind of person who wants to do the right thing. Others taught the importance of doing good; Jesus taught how to be good. He didn't teach behavior modification alone; he taught how to change the sources of behavior. It's my hope that you will begin to think of Jesus as your leader. Then you will know what to do with your calling to lead others.


    1. John Stott, Basic Christian Leadership (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2002), 11.
    2. The plan is commonly called the Great Commission. See Matthew 28:18-20 and Acts 1:5-8. It is not that the church has ignored these instructions; it's that we have misunderstood and misapplied them.
    3. The church became legal with the Edict of Milan in 313 CE. This was both the apex of its success and the beginning of its decline. One hundred years later, it was compromised and corrupt.
    4. Dallas Willard, The Divine Conspiracy (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1998), 13.
    5. Matthew 11:29-30.

    Written by Bill Hull

    Taken from The Christian Leader by Bill Hull. Copyright © 2016 by Robert W. Hull. Used by permission of Zondervan. www.zondervan.com.

  • The Gospel We Preach Determines Who We Become

    by Bill Hull

    The Jesus I believe in and the gospel I preach determines the kind of person I become and the kind of disciples I will make. I appreciate the words of E. Stanley Jones, “If God isn’t like Jesus, he ought to be.” Jesus is my motivation for discipleship. He is my teacher, my leader, my Lord, and my God; he is the exclusive revelation of God. 

    The letter to the Hebrews puts it this way: 

    Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world. He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds he universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, having become as much superior to angels as the name he has inherited is more excellent than theirs (Heb. 1:1–4 ESV, emphasis added; see also John 1:1–3; Col. 1:15–20).

    When we think of God, we should see Jesus on the cross. This is our God who sacrifices, lives, and dies for the sake of others. He cares in such a way that he holds nothing of himself back. “For this is how God loved: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. God send his Son into the world not to judge the world, but to save the world through him” (John 3:16–17 NLT). Ultimately, this is why we must respond to his command to go and make disciples of all peoples. Jesus gave his all; now I must give my all for him. All who are called to salvation are called to follow Jesus as his disciples. No exceptions. No excuses. Jesus held nothing back, and neither can we.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Human Effort or Divine Sovereignty?

    by Bill Hull

    We know Jesus has sent us as his disciples into the world to make more disciples. But the world is asking us a question about this mission: Can our message and our God be trusted? Is the offer of God’s grace—that we can know Christ; be saved from the consequences of our sin; and gain eternal life in God—really legitimate?

    At heart, Christians believe we serve a God who is just, righteous, and holy. But some presentations of God portray him as uncaring and even content to consign large portions of humanity to condemnation. Or they emphasize a God whose will is done regardless of human choice. Is there a way to think of God and his plan that emphasizes human responsibility while acknowledging our desperate need for a Savior?

    Admittedly there is an element of mystery in all of this, and I don’t claim to have solved this question. Regardless of our particular theological position on human choice and free will, at some level we must all acknowledge that our choices do matter. We may never get any closer to knowing the ultimate answer to this dilemma (which resides in God alone). But as a practical matter when making disciples, we must act and live as if our choices are real choices and that we are ultimately responsible for what we say and do. On this all can agree—whether Calvinist or Arminian. Even the most ardent disciples of determinism knows that they must choose to get out of bed, choose to wear certain clothes, choose to eat some kind of food, and even choose to possess a particular attitude. We all pray to God to help us make our decisions, but we know that our decisions are not made for us. We are responsible for them.

    God’s heart is revealed in the truth that he wants all to come to repentance and be saved (2 Peter 3:9). Therefore the fact that many will not be saved says more about the depravity of human sin than it does about the nature of God. God takes our decisions seriously. The price of our choice to reject God is the evil of sin. But we can also choose to repent and obey God and enjoy the blessings of engaging in relationship with our Creator. We can truly love and be loved. As Thomas Aquinas said, “God causes and moves our will, and yet without the will ceasing to be free.”*

    As you make disciples, don’t fall for the extremes. On the one hand is the mistake of thinking that our salvation is entirely up to us, completely dependent on our knowledge, our will, and our choices. But salvation is always by grace—the undeserved gift of God. On the other hand is the wrong thinking that since everything is predetermined, our choices no longer matter. But our choices matter because God has chosen to bring his gospel to the world through us and has given us the responsibility of making disciples. There is no plan B. We must choose to walk in dependence upon God each day, relying upon his grace and working strenuously to making disciples who make disciples.

    *Quoted in Brian Davies, The Thoughts of Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Clarendon, 1992), 267.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Is the Church a Faithful Witness?

    by Bill Hull

    I described the notion of world revolution in my post "What Makes a Revolution Successful?" To build off that concept, one popular idea of revolution is captured in a phrase coined by James Davidson Hunter: the church is a faithful witness. Hunter’s view is that the church does not have the power to achieve political goals and grand notions of transforming the world. What’s the alternative? The alternative I would recommend is to adopt the plan of Jesus to be a light to the world, in other words to make disciples who then make even more disciples. (Matt 28:18-20).

    Obviously, this method is not one that brings change quickly. It takes time. It doesn’t make the headlines. It is a person-to-person approach. We tell others the good news and people are publically baptized. Then we teach them to do everything Jesus taught us, including how to make more disciples, all until the story is told to all the earth. When this is complete, Jesus says that he will return and make things right (Matt. 24:14; 28:18–20).

    Being a quite revolutionary is not flashy or complicated. It is simply living an authentic life and Christian witness embedded in society, preserving and illuminating God’s truth until he returns to establish his kingdom. I am an advocate that personal influence is the key to changing culture. Hunter presents a different approach which involves cultural elites and powerful networks. Hunter and I agree that we are called to be faithful witnesses. But I see that the starting point is character change, disciples who make other disciples. Then when multiplication begins, it will create what Hunter describes as social or cultural change

    Four Ways of Social Change

    Hunter sees four ways in which social change happens that he presents as more determinative than commitment to make disciples and to teach everyone everything that Jesus commanded (Matt. 28:20). 

    Jesus told us to make disciples and said almost nothing about society and networks. Hunter presents the key actor in history is not individual genius but the network. New institutions are created out of networks. As an example, Hunter points to outlawing slavery in England. Most would contend that this victory was due to the character of William Wilberforce. Hunter, however, says it was due to the Clapham Circle, a powerful network of Christian abolitionists, of which Wilberforce was a member. I would say it was the character of Wilberforce which led to the advocacy of the Clapham Circle.

    Dr. Hunter, a sociologist, has observed the following trends:

    1. The individuals, networks, and institutions most critically involved in the production of culture operate at the center where prestige is the highest. Power is at the center, not on the periphery where the status is low. For example if the president of Harvard believes the right thing, he will have more impact than your local plumber.
    2. Long-term cultural change always occurs from the top down. It is the work of the elites, the gatekeepers who provide creative direction and management to the leading institutions of society. I believe that while there are examples of elites and gatekeepers changing society, that it begins in the grass roots. One could argue that Pastor Rick Warren leads a powerful church and world-wide network and that is the reason people listen to him. That is true in its present manifestation, but Pastor Rick’s influence is based on his character and being a faithful witness. First there was Rick Warren, and over a thirty year period Saddleback Church became a major force, then there was The Purpose Driven Church, and The Purpose Driven Life. My point is you begin with the person who then creates the effect, network or movement that then a sociologist would recognize as elite or a center of power.
    3. World change is most intense when the networks of elites and the institutions they lead overlap. According to Hunter, it is a consistent pattern that the impetus, energy, and direction for changing the world are greatest where cultural, economic, and often political resources come together in a common purpose.[3]

    To be clear, what Hunter is advocating is different from the Jesus way of transformation through personal evangelism and discipleship. If Hunter is right, then Jesus’ plan is wrong, and our churches would be wasting time in attempting to change the world by working with ordinary people. The church should be targeting the key cultural players as the primary strategy.

    The Role of Ordinary People

    While Hunter may be somewhat correct on his first point, in that social elites do lead important institutions and networks, his remaining points tend to downplay the role ordinary people play in God’s economy. Contrary to his second point, a certain carpenter from the backwater of Nazareth seemed to break this rule. Historian Randall Balmer writes, “My reading of American religious history is that religion always functions best from the margins of society and not in the councils of power. Once you identify the faith with a particular candidate or party or with the quest for political influence, ultimately it is the faith that suffers.”[4] So while Hunter, a sociologist, sees the main potential for change at the center, Balmer says the church has done its greatest work out of the limelight, in the margins. In other words, the church has been at its best when it had the least.

    On Hunter’s third point, one could argue that grassroots movements actually bring about the greatest change. Hunter holds that the Renaissance, the Reformation, the Great Awakenings, the Enlightenment, the triumph of capitalism, and all democratic revolutions in the West began among elites and then percolated into the larger society. In other words, even if reproducing disciples are the salt of the earth and the light of the world, we will not see revolution until cultural elites get involved.

    To be fair, I think Hunter would agree that Jesus didn’t tell us to take over the world or dominate or control it in anyway. Our role is to be faithful witnesses until he returns and makes things right. But I believe Jesus has set the bar higher in his plan and kind of revolution, which Dallas Willard characterizes in this way: “We must make no mistake about it. In sending out his [disciples], he set afoot a perpetual world revolution: one that is still in process and will continue until God’s will is done on earth as it is in heaven. As this revolution culminates, all forces of evil known to mankind will be defeated and the goodness of God will be known, accepted, and joyously conformed to in every aspect of human life. He has chosen to accomplish this with and, in part, through his [disciples].”[5]

    Willard specifically says here, “until God’s will is done on earth as it is in heaven.” This speaks of the revolution culminating at Christ’s return, when he will defeat the physical and spiritual forces of evil. This is the time of judgment, when Christ finally establishes his rule over all and creates the new heavens and the new earth. So while we have a role in his revolution, we are not the ones to ultimately complete it. Our role is partial, yet crucial and significant because we are the means God uses in the revolution today.

    We start the revolution, and Jesus finishes it

    It is understood that we cannot ultimately seek to rule until Christ has returned, because he is the only one who rules. Balmer is right. Our churches will be suffering, persecuted communities until Christ’s return, so the authority we have must be exercised from the margins of society. McKnight is also right in saying that political power is too weak. And Willard is right in reminding us that we have an important part to play as the church.

    Above all, though, Jesus is right. The way we bring change is to be his disciples and to make disciples. What elevates making disciples above all else is the reality that only our churches can do this. If we don’t make disciples, no one else will. Christians should be involved in politics, business, the media, and among the cultural elites. We should work among the poor and in the margins of society. But in all of our work, we cannot forget our primary mission. We have a unique calling to make disciples who make disciples. And this, above all else, must be our focus.

    [1] James Davison Hunter, in an address to Trinity Forum, June 21–22, 2003. Summarized by Jay Lorensen on June 10, 2006, in Leadership Movements: Marks of a Movement, www.onmovements.com.

    [2] Hunter, Trinity Forum.

    [3] Randall Balmer, God in the White House, 167, quoted in McKnight, Conspiracy, 267.

    [4] Willard, Renovation, 14–15. The first “[disciples]” is trainees in the original, and the second is students.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • What Makes a Revolution Successful?

    by Bill Hull

    In order for any revolution to succeed, it needs to be perpetually reproducing. It should penetrate all domains of society: entertainment, government, sports, the arts, media, education, the home, the church, and volunteer community groups organizations. Some revolutionaries artificially attempt to do this, but successful revolutions occur naturally, penetrating all domains by the power of their message. 

    This is why a revolution is more than just picketing outside a corporation or on the steps of Congress. You can make a statement this way, but it cannot be said that you have penetrated or transformed anything. Or consider doing street evangelism in front of a civic center during a convention. This activity is less effective than having advocates inside the organization actively promoting the cause.

    Often our churches have attempted to bring change from the outside without penetrating the domains of society. We feel good about ourselves because we have done something, but what have we really accomplished? Most people ignore what we say. They only remember that we bothered them and may be thankful they are not like us.

    Throughout church history...

    Very capable Christians have made a variety of attempts to significantly impact the world. One such attempt was by the Roman Emperor Constantine. I believe we can learn from his mistakes and by dong so can avoid what some have called the Constantinian temptation. Scot McKnight defines this as “the temptation to get the state to combine its powers with the church’s powers to accomplish, institutionalize, and legalize what is perceived to be divine purposes.”[1] This temptation is still very much alive. Whenever church leaders abandon the ways of Jesus and rely upon the power of the state to accomplish their work, we are all in danger of succumbing to this temptation.

    Through the edict of Milan in 311, Constantine declared Christianity to be legal in the Roman Empire. Several years later, he made it the official state religion and joined the church with the state. Though his intentions were good, the result was compromise in the church and centuries of decline in Christian spiritual vitality. Over the centuries that followed, the European church became more oppressive as it compromised the gospel with the secular power, leading to the revolution called the Protestant Reformation.[2]

    In the United States, we no longer have the marriage of church and state that was the norm in Europe. But we have the gospels of the left and the right.[3] Both versions fall victim to a variation of the Constantinian temptation. As McKnight says, “Leftists today worry about the Religious Right’s blending of church and state, and not without reason, the Right worries that the Religious Left does the very same thing with its version of a naked public square. Any every attempt to get the government or state to legislate what Christians believe and therefore to enforce Christian beliefs through the law is to one degree or another Constantinian.”[4]

    Both the Christian right and left attempt to get the government to promote certain behaviors and to prohibit others. Virtually everyone agrees that all law is based upon some type of moral norm. The question is which moral norms should be enforced through the authority of civil law, and which should be punished by the state. The Right wants laws prohibiting gay marriage and abortion, while the left wants law that promote social justice and punish hate speech. But both sides err when they make civil law and governmental enforcement the end game. True change does not come through external laws but by transforming human character. We will not see lasting revolution when we pursue change by law because Jesus is not working to make us into moral and religious people. He is working to make us into people who do not hate or murder because we are not angry and who do not steal because we respect other people’s property.

    Good Laws and Good People

    Again to be clear, I believe a good argument can be made for promoting morality through governmental action. And good people should promote goodness in and through the government. But we must not confuse having good laws with making good people. The goodness that makes our laws good is God, for God is the source of good.[5] A remnant of his goodness still resides in every human being because we have been made in God’s image. But this goodness can be suppressed, which results in searing the conscience. Because of fallen human nature, we must not hope to change the world through the legal system and power of the government. The world can only be changed by the power of the gospel. McKnight quotes Carl Henry to support this point. “Christians have a biblical reason for seeking a predominantly regenerate society. But do they . . . have reason also to legislate all scriptural principles upon public institutions including government and schools? Will not Christians be disillusioned and in fact discredited if by political means they seek to achieve goals that the Church should ideally advance by preaching and evangelism?”[6]

    History has shown that gains won by the religious right have been short-lived. For example while some laws have passed at the state level defining of marriage as between a man and a woman and restricting abortion, for the most part laws have shifted to the left. And even when states have made laws that support conservative morality, the courts have struck them down. While necessary work must be done in the political and legal spheres, our churches must not be confused about their calling and mission. We fight a spiritual battle, a war for people’s character, and we rely primarily upon the influence that Jesus and the testimony of his disciples have—not external laws or political movements.

    Have you fallen prey to the Constantinian temptation? Ask yourself, would things be better if our churches could take over our government? What if the international church ruled the world? Would things improve? My answer is a resounding No. I believe that before the church can take over the world, Christ must take over the church.

    [1] Scot McKnight, The Kingdom Conspiracy (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2014), 260.

    [2] Many good histories have been written on this subject. McKnight, Conspiracy, 260, is a good place to start.

    [3] Both are described in chapter 1 of this work.

    [4] McKnight, Conspiracy, 262.

    [5] See Mark 10:18, where Jesus says that God alone is good.

    [6] McKnight, Conspiracy, 266.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • World Revolution

    by Bill Hull

    In his book Renovation of the Heart, Dallas Willard writes, “We must make no mistake about it. In sending out his [disciples], he set afoot a perpetual world revolution: one that is still in process and will continue until God’s will is done on earth as it is in heaven.”[1] As Christ’s disciples, we are more than just residents in this world; we are revolutionaries. We have been sent, as Bonhoeffer says, into the “world come of age.” We live in a world where science, philosophy, psychology, technology, and transportation have shrunk the world into a global village. This world is topsy-turvy, for light has been declared darkness and darkness declared light. In this environment, it is vital that we are not conflicted or confused about our mission, because we will receive a great deal of pushback (John 16:33).

    In reading this book, you may have picked up my affinity for Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Bonhoeffer was intellectual and aristocratic, and his understanding of revolution was elitist. He advocated for a completely free and trained pastoral nobility who could preach the Word of God and discern the spirits of the age. He wrote, “They would be a phalanx of the intellectual elite suitable to match wits with the ‘spirit of the age.’ They would form an aristocracy of responsibility—a nobility of righteous doers and prayerful pilgrims.”[2]

    Going Deeper

    While I love Bonhoeffer’s idea and would have loved to have been included in his plans, I believe his ideas just did not go deep enough. These pastors would only have sparked a revolution among the intellectually gifted, and Bonhoeffer assumed that the masses would simply follow their intellectual leaders. The German masses had followed their Führer, Bonhoeffer reasoned, so why wouldn’t they follow a righteous leader if Hitler was out of the way? We’ll never know if Bonhoeffer’s plans would have borne fruit, for his dream was cut short when the Gestapo closed his grand experiment, and most of his intellectual elite were drafted into the German army and sent to the Russian front to die.

    Peter Drucker once quipped, “Culture will eat strategy’s lunch every time.”Bonhoeffer’s plan was halted because the devilish Aryan heresy had a death grip on Germany. But Jesus’ commission—his disciple-making plan to change the world—is far broader and more powerful. His vision is for a perpetual revolution that will continue, unabated, until God’s “will be done, on earth as it is in heaven” (Matt. 6:10). Jesus’ plan is flexible, able to adapt to different cultures and times and designed to grow, multiply, and spread across the earth. It is sustainable, able to last for centuries. Jesus’ plan takes into consideration that to sustain a movement like this, the objective—the end goal—must be very clear.

    Jesus' Warning

    Jesus warned his disciples to keep this clear goal in mind to guard against competing loyalties, “No one can serve two masters. For you will hate one and love the other; you will be devoted to one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money. . . . Seek the Kingdom of God above all else, and live righteously, and he will give you everything you need” (Matt. 6:24, 33 NLT).

    With foresight into some of our current challenges, Bonhoeffer spoke approvingly of the development of what he called “religionless Christianity,” meaning serious discipleship stripped of all the hypocritical and disabling baggage of institutional churches. The German Evangelical Church of the 1930s was a model of capitulation, compromise, and hypocrisy. By contrast, a flood of Christ’s disciples sent into the morass that is society is a cure for its ills. But those disciples, above all else, must know God and be filled with the Holy Spirit. They must also know God’s Word and have their minds and hearts stripped and freed from anything other than Christ himself.

    [1] (Colorado Springs: Navpress, 2002), 14–15. “[Disciples]” is trainees in the original.

    [2] Quoted in Charles Marsh, Strange Glory (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014), 378.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Pastors Must Know God

    by Bill Hull

    At one time, John Wesley was a parish priest in the Anglican Church. He spent most of his life, however, as the pastor of a worldwide congregation. A statue of Wesley stands in the courtyard of his last parish on City Street in London. The inscription on the statue’s base is, “The world is my parish.” Wesley’s impact was not only through his oral teaching but also his writing and organizing people into transformative groups and communities.

    As I mention in Conversion and Discipleship, pastors are the custodians of the knowledge of God. They are the last group in our society who are free to teach this knowledge, and the responsibility to do it should weigh heavy upon them. Well-educated pastors are vital to the health and well-being of both churches and society. In his “Address to the Clergy,” John Wesley said:

    Ought not a Minister to have, First, a good understanding, a clear apprehension, a sound judgment, and a capacity of reasoning with some closeness is not this necessary in an high degree for the work of ministry. Otherwise, how will he be able to understand the various states of those under his care; or to steer them through a thousand difficulties and dangers, to the haven where they would be is it not necessary, with respect to the numerous enemies whom he has to encounter. Can a fool cope with all the men that know not God, and with all the spirits of darkness? . . . Secondly, No less necessary is a knowledge of the Scriptures, which teach us how to teach others, yea, a knowledge of all the Scriptures; seeing Scripture interprets Scripture; one part fixing the sense of another. So that, whether it be true or not, that every good textuary is a good Divine.[1]

    Knowledge of God is not just necessary for discipleship. It is essential for pastors and leaders because we are fighting a spiritual war against an enemy who opposes all that we do. As Paul teaches, “We are human, but we don’t wage war as humans do. We use God’s mighty weapons, not worldly weapons, to knock down the strongholds of human reasoning and to destroy false arguments. We destroy every proud obstacle that keeps people from knowing God. We capture their rebellious thoughts and teach them to obey Christ” (2 Cor. 10:3–5 NLT).

    The war we fight is a knowledge war. 

    Just like Elijah standing before the prophets of Baal, pastors stand with the Bible in their hand and speak truth to the reality of life. Though we no longer call down literal fire, our words spoken and taught should burn within people’s heart. And as the winds of the Spirit blow upon the sparks of the Word of God, the flames of revival may yet again burn in our churches and in the world.

    For many pastors in our post-Christian culture, speaking truth is becoming increasingly dangerous because popular cultural morality is considered superior to Christian morality, and the gospel of tolerance is celebrated.[2] Jesus Christ, the light of the world, has been replaced by human reason that rejects revelation. Pastors must battle against these ideas as they teach and disciple in their congregations.

    Recently a pastoral friend of mine preached a sermon on human sexuality, presenting the straightforward teaching of the Bible, the same basic teaching that has been presented for two thousand years. His basic message was clear: if people are gay or straight, sexually active outside of marriage, and attend their church, they are welcome and loved by God and the congregation. But the pastor was also clear that God created sexuality as a gift for marriage between a man and a woman. He explained why pre-martial sex, adultery, divorce, and aberrant forms of sexuality are sin, which is rebellion against God.[3] His point was that we all are sinners, but he was clear that we cannot tolerate any sin or accept sin as the norm. His message was both honest and compassionate.

    After the Message was Posted

    But soon after the message was posted, the pastor was excoriated on the internet and by the local press. Headlines on social media included, “Local pastor refuses to repent of homophobia” and “Extremist pastor says all gays should be killed.” These dishonest headlines went viral, and the pastor and his family received death threats. According to cultural morality, disagreeing with someone’s sexual behavior is considered judgmental, narrow minded, bigoted, and intolerant. Darkness indeed is being declared light and light is being consigned to darkness.

    Disciple-making pastors must face challenges like this head-on. They must speak from God’s Word when defining what is normal. In doing so they define the world and the church by explaining who we are and how we are to live to represent Christ. Pastors as teachers to the nations reveal knowledge that is a mystery to most and that cannot be understood from the outside—it is revealed, not figured out.

    [1] John Wesley, “An Address to the Clergy,” Wesley Center Online, Wesley.nwu.edu, 482–83.

    [2] This idea came from Dallas Willard, Renovation of the Heart (Colorado Springs: Navpress, 2002), 230–31.

    [3] Rom. 1:18–32 was the primary New Testament passage used in the sermon.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • 5 Steps Toward Recovering the Gospel at Your Church

    by Bill Hull

    For the context of the following blog read "A Letter from Dallas Willardfirst.

    Recovering the gospel from the ground up is the “scriptural interpretation and theological reformulation” that Dallas Willard refers to. Preaching gospel to the congregation and teaching them new ways of thinking and following Jesus is the “modification of time-hardened practices.” Inevitably, we will receive pushback when we get to the “radical changes in what we do in the way of ‘church.’” In other words, this will not be easy!

    What makes this recover especially difficult is that for so long, pastors and preachers have depended on packaged explanations of the good news. If you are starting from scratch and building your understanding from the Scriptures, you may find yourself challenged and experiencing some discomfort. To help you, let me suggest that you begin with five steps.

    1. Study 1 Corinthians 15:1–28

    This is the best “skeleton” for understanding the gospel. It covers the story at the heart of the message: Jesus was born; he lived; he preached; he was crucified, died, buried, and raised; and he will come again to establish his kingdom, bring an end to sin, and judge the world. This is the basic story. Remember that it is a story that takes time to tell in context. I’ve added a few extra things into the story above, but more is usually needed for people to fully appreciate the significance of the teachings, life, death, and resurrection of Christ in context.

    2. Refine the words in your salvation vocabulary

    Be sure that you understand what you mean when you use words like faith, believe, trust, sin, grace, works, repentance, confess, obedience, and conversion. Study how the words are used in the Scriptures and how they are connected to the context.

    3. Preach on the apostolic sermons in the Book of Acts

    These sermons are the closest you will get to what the apostles thought the gospel was. Considering they had just spent forty days with the resurrected Christ after three years of observation and instruction, these sermons of the apostles are your most reliable source. The sermons are presented primarily in a Jewish context, so connecting the story of Jesus to the story of Israel is crucial to putting the gospel in the full context of redemptive history.

    One sermon in Acts is helpful for understanding how to present the gospel in a non-Jewish context. It is Paul’s sermon on Mars Hill, given to the Athenians recorded in Acts 17:16–34.

    4. Preach from the four Gospels

    Consider Scot McKnight’s words, “I believe the word gospel has been hijacked by what we believe about personal salvation, and the gospel itself has been reshaped to facilitate making decisions. The result of this hijacking is that the word gospel no longer means in our world what it originally meant to either Jesus or the Gospels.”[1] When you understand the gospel, you know the whole story of humankind, from creation to consummation. The Gospels tell story after story of Jesus, his power, glory, life, and teaching. They help us to put together how and why Jesus came and what he did, and they contain his directions on what his disciples were to do after he was gone.

    Augustine explained the Gospels this way: “In the four Gospels, or better in the four books of the one Gospel.”[2] The authors of the Gospels saw themselves not as historians but as witnesses. So read them as witnesses, saturate your mind with the stories, tell them again and again, and then announce to the congregation, “This is the gospel!” The Gospels tell us that Jesus is the promised deliverer of Israel and of his coming, life, death, resurrection, commissioning his followers, promised return, and wisdom about life. It’s all there.

    5. Teach your people to recognize the popular “gospels” that are commonly taught

    As I presented in chapter 1, at least six common gospels are preached today. It is important that your people learn to see and understand the biblical gospel, not just for what it is, but also for what it is not. So point out to them what each of the other gospels is saying naturally and where each naturally leads. For example if a congregation can see how the consumer gospel will never lead to Christlike disciples, they will better understand how the biblical gospel does.

    The process of learning the new, recovered gospel will inevitably create confusion and disorientation, so teaching must be done carefully. There is an old saying, “A mist in the pulpit is a fog in the pew.” Back in the days before microphones, pulpits were set high above the pews to help project the preacher’s voice. If you know anything about fog, you know that it tends to condense in lower regions. So the meaning of the saying is simple: if a preacher is confused, there is no hope for the congregation.

    Keep this in mind as you trade out old illustrations and phrases that you’ve used for years and replace them with new ways of communicating that organically connect conversion with discipleship. What you do not want is a rebellion based out of accusations and misunderstandings. Remember what Paul said to Timothy, “A servant of the Lord must not quarrel but be kind to everyone, be able to teach, and be patient with difficult people. Gently instruct those who oppose the truth. Perhaps God will change those people’s hearts, and they will learn the truth” (2 Tim. 2:24–25 NLT).

    Also remember that we are not necessarily correcting heresies that lie outside the pale of orthodoxy. Much of the time, we are simply adding nuance, pointing out wrong directions in the way people are thinking, and clarifying confusing or misleading assumptions. What we have today is a corruption of the gospel that has greatly hindered our churches, but the gospel has not been lost completely. Correcting these misunderstandings will take kindness, gentleness, and patience—not accusations of heresy.

    [1] Scot McKnight, The King Jesus Gospel, revised edition (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2011), 26.

    [2] Augustine, Tractates on the Gospel according to St. John 36.1.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • A Letter from Dallas Willard

    By Bill Hull

    The following is a letter I received from Dallas Willard on December 27, 2007:

    Dear Bill:

    I regret being so slow to respond, and I hope you will forgive me. In fact I had to get through a heavy patch of paper grading, and then got obsessed with a couple of difficult chapters in what I hope will be another book. I think your observations on REVEAL are right on. You were very gentle, as we should be, and I think I will be, too. In fact, I would like to be rather indirect. I love and admire the folks at Willow Creek, as I imagine you do, and would like not to offend them in any way. If they were to ask me for my opinion, I would be more direct and thorough. But they haven’t, and so I shall simply say a few things from which implications about the report can be drawn.

    The main difficulty for “church life” as we know it, and one which proves to be practically insurmountable for most churches, is posed by the way people are brought into the church. Or, I should say “ways,” for in fact they come in a number of different ways or with diverse understandings of what it means. (Usually no one carefully works through their understanding with them.) What really matters here is how they understand what they are committed to by being there. That means, among other things, what they have agreed to let the staff do with them. As a result they standardly suppose that if they attend the main services with some regularity and contribute some amount of money, they are doing their part, and the pastor has no further real claim upon them. A small percentage of church members might think they should take some extra courses or seminars if they are in line with their interests, and a smaller percentage still might do some teaching or some custodial or committee work. But these activities almost never have any effect upon their growth in what a candid reading of the New Testament would suggest it is all about: for example, actually taking on the character of love as seen in 1 Cor. 13 or 1 John 4. Or putting off the old person and putting on the new, as Paul puts it in Col. 3, or “putting on the Lord Jesus Christ,” as in Romans 13:14 (really, 8–14).

    And then the church, quite naturally, can do very little with people who are there with such shallow understandings of what being a Christian is all about. They wind up thinking that involvement with the church’s activities will lead to spiritual transformation. But they do not really expect it to happen, and they do nothing that would be likely to foster it. Really, they cannot. Their hands are tied by the background assumption of what it is to be a Christian. And if they challenge that assumption, they are apt to be accused of switching the goods advertised, adding to grace, and of outright heresy. This is because of what they heard as the gospel when they came in the door.

    The teaching about salvation that is now an American cultural artifact is that you confess faith in the death of Jesus on your behalf, and then you join up with a group that is trying to get others to do the same. That is all that is essential. So it is thought and taught. “Spiritual growth” is not required on this scheme, and there is no real provision for it. Salvation is free, which means you need do nothing else but “accept.” Then you too can sing Amazing Grace. Just observe who sings “Amazing Grace” now, and in what circumstances. You don’t really even have to accept it, just sing about it. Not even that. It is wholly passive.

    To deal with this situation, one has to start with what you preach as the message of salvation and what you take salvation to be. Salvation is spiritual transformation, which is not an option for those with special interests. Grace is situated in that “salvation.” If you had a group, and you wanted to see such salvation in them, you would have to start from the beginning and teach closely. Do inductive Bible study on “grace” and all of the other central terms of our church discourse, and build your preaching and teaching around what you discover. Remember to include “repentance” and “faith.” You would probably lose a lot of people, and have to rebuild your work. This has been done with great success in past times. The earliest church is the best illustration of the painful process and of the success that can accompany it. Genuine discipleship in the church context of today is very much like discipleship to Jesus in the Jewish religion of his day.

    Grace, faith, repentance, and salvation are not church things. They are life things, and spiritual transformation is something that happens only when people intelligently and resolutely take their whole life into the kingdom of God. I believe that the REVEAL study does not proceed along these lines, but hopes to make “church” work for honest transformation into Christlikeness without changing the fundamental assumptions. Undoubtedly I am wrong about many things. I pray for God to teach and empower us all to do his will his way.

    Best blessings in Christ,


    My Considerations from Willard’s Letter

    • A major problem is the various ways people are brought into churches.
    • We must again ask, “What does it mean to be a Christian?”
    • What claim and authority does the pastor and church have on a member’s life?
    • What can be done in teaching, training, and transforming if it is limited by a shallow understanding of the gospel and discipleship?
    • The contemporary gospel is an American cultural artifact, namely, you can become a Christian and not follow Jesus. Discipleship is optional.
    • The gospel will need to be carefully rebuilt from the ground up, and it must change some of our fundamental assumptions.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The 8 Components of a Disciple-Making Pastor

    by Bill Hull

    The DNA of discipleship is implanted by the Holy Spirit and developed by reading Scripture. It is further nurtured by the influence of those who teach us. Jesus said it well, “The student is not above the teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like their teacher” (Luke 6:40). Sometimes it is nurtured through the enthusiasm of another who advocates disciple-making as a way of life and work.

    I was blessed to have been taught from the start that the Great Commission should be the centerpiece of my pastoral ministry. I was also inspired by the example of John Wesley. His philosophy was to begin by getting people to behave in a certain way and let belief and reason follow. Working this out in my own ministry only deepened my conviction to prioritize disciple-making. I also read widely and was influenced by many books. Seminary was an important piece in the equation, not so much for teaching me the philosophy of discipleship, but for teaching me how to study and research, which I have used for the rest of my life. But my most important learning was in churches, working with people, seeing what they needed, and adapting to circumstances.

    Over time, the DNA for multiplying disciples developed within me. What is this DNA? It has eight key components, listed below. Most of these are covered at some point in Conversion and Discipleship.

    1. A pastor’s first priority is growing every member of the church to be a mature, reproducing disciple.
    2. Every person called to salvation is called to discipleship.
    3. The gospel expects all disciples to make other disciples.
    4. All ministry activities should be evaluated by their contribution to growing mature, reproducing disciples.
    5. The method should be Jesus’ way of personally making disciples who make other disciples.
    6. Success should be measured not by how many disciples are made, but by how many disciples are making other disciples.
    7. Our churches exist for making disciples, and disciples are God’s gift to the world.
    8. The ultimate goal of making disciples is world revolution. When the gospel is preached to all peoples, the end will come (Matthew 24:14).

    To summarize all of this, I borrow the wise words of Pat Morley. “A disciple-making pastor has a vision to disciple every person in his church, a determination to make it happen, and a system for sustaining it.”*

    *Pat Morely, notes I took in conversation, August, 2014.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The Four Types of Disciple Makers

    by Bill Hull

    By now you should realize I believe that all pastors are called to make disciples. I also believe that virtually all desire to make disciples. In some way, most believe they are already doing so. But like other work in life, you know if the work of discipleship is being done by the fruit it produces. Our desire to make disciples is much like our desire to be fit, eat right, get plenty of sleep, and develop a less stressful schedule. The desire is there, but if we lack an intentional plan, we end up out of shape, overweight, cranky, and stressed. And we make excuses to avoid living with the constant guilt. We need an intentional plan for disciple-making. If we have no plan, there is no chance of discipleship happening. There will be no fruit.

    Some will offer excuses at this point, and many of these are true. They will say they never get around to disciple-making because of other pressing issues. Most pastors find the daily realities of overseeing a congregation prove to be the greatest obstacle. But having a reason doesn’t mean you have a valid excuse.

    When it comes to disciple-making, pastors are like the soil in the parable of the sower (Matt. 13:18–23). Many hear the message and just don’t understand it. For years, pastors have taught that making disciples means evangelizing the world. They skip over Jesus’ imperative in the Great Commission to “make disciples” and pay little attention to the sentence, “Teach these new disciples to obey all the commands I have given you (Matt. 28:20 NLT). That was something for Christian educators to figure out.

    Other pastors get excited about making disciples and enthusiastically try, but they run into problems. As soon as it gets difficult and the price becomes too high, they drop the idea. Sure they may dabble in it a bit from time to time, but it is not the focus of their ministry.

    A third category of pastors are those who hear the call to make disciples and give it go, but the mundane and the ordinary nature of the work causes it to lose its appeal. These pastors get sucked into quicker, easier, programmatic approaches. They hear something is working in another church, and they switch plans, abandoning the daily, ongoing work of personally forming disciples. It’s not that these pastors are distracted. They just grow bored.

    The fourth category of pastors are those who hear and understand. The seeds of disciple-making take root, and they produce a harvest of thirty, sixty, or even a hundred times as much through a commitment to make disciples who make more disciples who make still more disciples (2 Tim. 2:2).


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Ready for the Discipleship Journey

    by Bill Hull

    I once spoke with a pastor who had just attended a conference with his staff on discipleship. He was highly motivated, so he approached me for advice. “After this week, I need to do something,” he said. “I have eight of my pastors with me, and we need to go home and come up with something to impact our congregation. What do you suggest?”

    I waited for about thirty seconds before answering. Then I told him to wait a bit more while I thought and prayed about his situation. After several minutes, I answered him. “Nothing,” I said. “Don’t start any programs, don’t make announcements, and don’t do anything public.”

    He seemed puzzled and confused. “What do you mean, Bill? Do nothing at all?”

    I explained, “You should go home, get around a table with your eight pastors, and ask them to go with you on a personal journey of discipleship for one full year. Then if you think your desire is real and that you truly have something to offer the church, invite others to join you on the journey.”

    I said this because I knew that journeying with his eight pastors would require patience, self-discipline, restraint, vulnerability, submission, grace, trust, confession, and a great deal of bonding. This year-long activity would be an act of courage as well, because in the eyes of most people, it would not look like they were doing much. It would just be eight people, not some flashy new program or event to sign up hundreds.

    But this is where we start and “make our bones” as a disciple-making pastor. It’s the hard thing we must do to find out if we are really in to disciple-making for the long haul. Start small. Disciple a few. And you will reveal the state of your soul as you open your life up to others. You will be exposed in ways you otherwise would have never been on display. In my experience, most pastors just aren’t ready for this.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • The Pastor's Largest Obstacle in Discipleship

    by Bill Hull

    Pastors are always struggling to decide how to best use their time. I am convinced that their most persistent daily obstacle is distraction. Pastoring is a type of work that is continually filled with choices. To use our time effectively, we must have a philosophy that guides our ministry and helps us set priorities. We need a picture of what we want to accomplish, something clear enough to us that we can remember it and explain it to others. 

    Recently a pastor shared with me a daily mantra he has made as an antidote for distraction, “I am a pastor who is making disciples who make other disciples.” He recites this sentence to himself several times daily, his staff does as well.

    Our vision should certainly include preaching, which is a key component of pastoral ministry, but we should broaden it to developing people in the way commanded by Jesus. Pastors have been entrusted with this responsibility, and as Paul points out, “Moreover it is required of stewards that they be found trustworthy” (1 Cor. 4:2 RSV). But there is a problem. To make trustworthy and faithful disciples, the teacher must first be trustworthy and faithful (See Luke 6:40; 2 Tim. 2:2).

    The Struggle is Real

    Having served as a pastor and worked with pastors for many years, I know that many struggle with distractions and a boatload of expectations. In response, some prioritize preaching; others try to be good at helping people with their needs; and others run programs or focus on leading staff. The tendency is to become either a narrow specialist or a generalist who does just a little bit of everything.

    On top of this, pastoral ministry is often specific and detailed because it focuses on individual people, and every person is unique. Pastors don’t “generally” love people—they minister to specific individuals who have different needs, which requires a demanding level of attention and detail.

    Committing to a Specific Way

    Finally, many pastors agree that making disciples is a good idea, but they have never committed to it in any specific way with specific people. They delegate the real work of discipling people to others who are often paid less, effectively deciding that this work is just not an essential task of their pastoral ministry.

    But all of this reveals a deeper problem. As we have seen, a church’s primary work is to make disciples. So if the pastor is leading the church to accomplish its mission, everything the pastor does must necessarily fall under this primary calling. Let me be up front: I am convinced that not making disciples is sin. And until pastors and leaders come to the point where they see anything other than total devotion to this task as a denial of their God-given calling and a gross sin, real change is unlikely to happen in their life and in their church.

    So where does church change begin? In the soul of pastors.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Release the Saints

    by Bill Hull

    Have you ever heard of Nupedia? In 2000, Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger believed they could revolutionize the way people access knowledge. Their idea was to develop a new online encyclopedia. Years ago, door-to-door salespersons tried to sell the Encyclopedia Britannica, a set of nicely printed volumes of the most up-to-date information on a wide variety of subjects. This series became one of the bestselling (but perhaps least read) of all time. Wales and Sanger’s idea was to gather knowledge by having the best and the brightest professors, historians, and researchers write articles and after careful editing, uploading the material to a website.

    But after three years, they pulled the plug on the project. The work was incredibly tedious. And they constantly got stuck in the editing phase, locked in ideological conflicts. After three years of work, they had only been able to post twenty-four articles. In desperation, Wales and Sanger wondered if they could fix their problems by developing a feeder system for Nupedia. Instead of generating the articles themselves, they would enlist ordinary men and women who were passionate about a subject to voluntarily submit articles. This way, they didn’t have to pay or prod people because they would want to write the articles. By the end of the first year, Wales and Sanger had posted twenty thousand articles. That project has become known as Wikipedia. It now has over twenty million articles and is the most accessible encyclopedia on earth.

    Sadly, many churches around the world operate like Nupedia. A few hired experts produce some results. But the work is tedious, slow, and will never achieve the intended goal. And the problem is obvious. Churches are not intended to work like a Nupedia. They are designed to work like Wikipedia. We must remove the bottleneck by restoring the priority of discipleship.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • 3 Characteristics of Spiritual Maturity

    by Bill Hull

    We can define the goal in several ways. I’ve hinted at a few already. Here, I simply offer three characteristics of personal spiritual maturity. Dallas Willard describes a spiritually mature person this way: “the apprentice is able to do, and routinely does, what he or she knows to be right before God because all aspects of his or her person has been substantially transformed" (Willard, Renovation, 226). Here are practical and observable benchmarks that indicate a person is growing into Christlikeness (all derived from Willard's Renovation, 226–28). 

    1. Mature Christians don’t defend themselves when found to be wrong.

    In fact, they are thankful to be found out and will fulfill the Proverb, “Correct the wise, and they will love you” (Prov. 9:8 NLT). This response stands out in our world because we all want to defend ourselves, explain our motives, and rationalize our behavior. In addition, Christlike people do not defend themselves against false accusations. They say what is needed to establish the facts so that justice can be done, but they are not obsessed with defending their reputation. If wronged, they accept it and entrust final justice to God. In this they follow the model of Jesus who made himself of no reputation (Philippians 2:5-8). Our reputation is something we give up when we decide to follow Jesus.

    2. Mature Christians don’t feel they are missing something by not sinning

    “It is better to be godly and have little than to be evil and rich” (Ps. 37:16). Mature people do not love sin. This does not mean they are no longer subject to temptation or that they are perfect. It means they aren’t attracted to the temporary and soul-destroying pleasures of sin. They do not feel deprived, as if God is withholding something good from them. It does not pain them that evildoers—or even the distracted semi-Christian population—live in riches and enjoy much recreation. The mature man does not think he is missing out by not lusting or engaging in pornography. The affections of the mature have changed, and their heart is attuned to a better sort of joy. They have developed a taste for other pleasures and find happiness in holiness. This shift is key to leaving behind sinful behaviors.

    3. Mature Christians find it easier and more natural to do God’s will than to not do it

    They take seriously what Jesus said, “Take my yoke upon you. Let me teach you, because I am humble and gentle of heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy to bear, and the burden I give you is light” (Matt. 11:29–30 NLT). Being formed to the full measure of the stature of Christ means that we want to do his will because our will is being shaped into his will. Increasingly, we do not find it as difficult to obey. In some areas, obeying is easier and more joyous than doing anything else.

    I realize that some do not believe this attitude is possible, and I admit that I was once among them. I am not denying the ongoing struggle of the Christian life. We are still engaged in war and must fight intense spiritual battles. But ultimately, obedience is what we want in our hearts. We must do a lot of dying on the journey. Jesus tells us to lay down the burden of religious performance, take up his yoke, and walk with him. He also promises us that his yoke will be light weight and easy to bear. Living in the grace of God and doing his will is not onerous.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • The Great Enemy

    by Bill Hull

    From 1935–1940, Dietrich Bonhoeffer led a seminary community of young preachers in Nazi Germany. The seminary did not have government support, and it was closed by the Gestapo in 1937. Yet it continued as an underground seminary for the next three years. During this time, Bonhoeffer penned a short jewel of spiritual insight explaining the lessons he and his students had learned living in this community together. The book is called Life Together, and in it, Bonhoeffer shares several key ideas that should form the foundation of any Christian community. 

    One of the most important is the idea that we must never be alone in our sin: “Those who remain alone with their evil are left utterly alone. It is possible that Christians may remain lonely in spite of daily worship together, prayer together, and all their community through service . . . for the pious community permits not one to be a sinner. . . . We are not allowed to be sinners. Many Christians would be unimaginably horrified if a real sinner were suddenly to turn up among the pious. So we remain alone with our sin, trapped in lies and hypocrisy, for we are in fact sinners.”[1]

    Bonhoeffer expresses the sad truth that in many of our churches, we are not allowed to be sinners. Even though church is the one place on earth where sin should be confessed and grace extended, it often isn’t. In many churches, people cover over and hide their sins. Or they confess “acceptable” sins while hiding worse sins for years. The goal of our enemy is simple and clear. If believers keep their mouth shut and hide their sin, they will continue to suffer guilt and live in defeat and shame.

    Speaking the Truth in Love

    Our churches need to recover the practice of speaking the truth in love. This means being honest about sin yet creating a culture of grace and love. The moment we come out of hiding, we begin to live in the light of forgiveness and fellowship (1 John 1:7–9). Speaking the truth in love means that we grow through conversations, specifically talking about sin and struggles and asking for help. But we must use the proper words to do this. Paul instructs, “Don’t use foul or abusive language. Let everything you say be good and helpful, so that your words will be an encouragement to those who hear them” (Eph. 4:29 NLT).

    The Bible speaks of the church as a community with trusting relationships and a gracious environment. Grace requires us to treat one another as God has treated us, which means better than we deserve. We grow to maturity as we learn and practice mature communication skills, for example talking about who God says we are instead of using the world’s labels and identities or the lies we believe about ourselves (Eph. 2:10). God says that every believer is gifted, every one has an important contribution to make, and every one is a saint and minister. One believer cannot say to another, “I don’t need you” (1 Cor. 12:21). Everyone must be treated as someone God values.

    But this does not just mean being nice to one another. It means listening to others when they confront us and getting rid of the bad habits that harm others. Paul lists several bad habits of the heart that need to be exposed and confronted, “Get rid of all bitterness, rage, anger, harsh words, and slander, as well as all types of evil behavior” (Eph. 4:31 NLT). Getting rid of these things is not something we do in a vacuum. The process begins with God’s word entering our minds, then requires speaking those words to one another and putting them into practice in our community of believers. Putting off harsh words and putting on kind words is a habit that we must acquire and develop with the help of the Holy Spirit.

    Why We Should Listen

    Bonhoeffer goes on to say, “Just as our love for God begins with listening to God’s word, the beginning of love for other Christians is learning to listen to them.”[2] Listening to others might be the greatest gift of love we can give them. And listening is always necessary because we cannot really help someone until we understand his or her need. Bonhoeffer further points out, “Christians who can no longer listen to one another will soon no longer be listening to God either; they will always be talking even in the presence of God.”[3] If we cannot learn to listen in silence, then we cannot properly learn to speak. In fact, our speech will be distorted and driven by our own unmet needs. Our communication will be about us and getting our needs met, not helping others.

    Again, let me stress that what is required here is not just being a nice person. We get angry when our sin is confronted. We grow defensive. We do not like it when people speak about our business. But this confronting is a necessary part of our discipleship, how we learn how to live our life as though Jesus was living it. Speaking the truth in love also requires being willing to receive the truth in love. Bonhoeffer reminds us, “Nothing can be more cruel than the leniency which abandons others to their sin. Nothing can be more compassionate than the severe reprimand which calls another Christian in one’s community back from the path of sin.”[4]

    Some religious communities are like a group of drowning people who won’t do what is necessary to save themselves because no one wants to go first. But speaking the truth in love is love at work, and it is necessary work.

    Grow into maturity as a community is not possible unless the parts of the body are working properly. Only then can our churches grow into wholeness and health. The big lie will continue to survive as long as pastors and church leaders avoid the discipleship process. Preaching alone will not change our churches. Good leadership methods won’t do it, either. Change requires disciple-making pastors making disciples who make disciples and form authentic communities that can model this process to others. This is a communal project.

    [1] Bonhoeffer, Life Together, 108.

    [2] Ibid., 98.

    [3] Ibid., 99.

    [4] Ibid., 105.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • How to Work Together for Discipleship

    by Bill Hull

    Paul begins Ephesians 4 by looking at how the body of Christ is one and how its members must work together to make everyone and everything whole. He instructs, “Always be humble and gentile. Be patient with each other, making allowance for each other’s faults because of your love. Make every effort to keep yourselves united in the Spirit, binding yourselves together with peace” (Eph. 4:2–3 NLT).

    Becoming a mature disciple means refusing to live a “minimalist” spiritual life in isolation (just me and Jesus). The mature also reject shortcuts. There are no steroids for spiritual growth. It is a long-term process that must be done with others, and it is challenging. Paul’s instructions to the church are personal, but not individualistic. He gives these instructions to the community, not individuals, because they must learn to intentionally train together.

    What We Can Learn through Church

    Our churches should be where we learn to love, both our friends and our enemies. Love is actions taken for the benefit of others. The emphasis here in Paul’s letter is on becoming a humble, patient, kind person. We must not put the responsibility on others to treat us well. It is our responsibility to respond with grace and love to others. Of course, we can find ways to avoid these relational challenges. Some people think they belong to a church by slipping into the service on Sunday morning and then slipping out without any meaningful contact. In my mind, they might as well skip the service and read the Sunday paper instead. Either way, they are living a banal life of self-absorption.

    At times our churches are beautiful, and at times the ugliness of sin shows through. I have never been loved so well nor hated so deeply than by my fellow followers of Christ. I have spent many sleepless nights dealing with conflict in my church. Yet in the end, most of the ugly stuff has faded from memory. We’ve worked out our conflicts, and God has turned them into good. Many scream in the middle of the pain of conflict, “I don’t need this!” But the Bible is clear that we do need it. God uses pain as fuel for our formation in Christ (1 Peter 1:6–9).

    Christ as Example

    Who was humble, patient, kind, sacrificial, and made allowances for our faults? Christ, of course (Phil. 2:5–8). Our churches should be dedicated to shaping us to become like Christ. We can’t get there without taking up our own cross and suffering. Becoming mature takes time and cannot be hurried. So leaders creating the right environment are basic to transformation.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Is the Church for You?

    by Bill Hull

    The promise of our modern churches to attenders has been something like this: We promise that if you practice certain disciplines and do it here in our church, you will become a mature Christian, which will bring glory to God and the church. Who can argue with this?

    Well, I do, for one. My dislike of this promise is similar to Karl Bonhoeffer’s dislike of the teachings of Sigmund Freud. Bonhoeffer characterized Freud’s psychotherapy as “the bad fruit of people who like to busy themselves with themselves.”* My problem with the contemporary approach to discipleship is its teaching that spiritual maturity is largely about the church. It’s a grand vision, to be sure, but few ever say that they have reached maturity. Who do you know has “become mature, attaining the whole measure of the fullness of Christ” (Eph 4:13)?

    The Real Question

    Part of the problem is that our focus is largely on ourselves. In our gatherings and small groups, we often ask, “How are you doing?” Or we might want accountability and ask others, “How am I doing?” While these questions have their place, they tend to divorce our discipleship from our mission. The real question in spiritual formation is not introspective—it is a concern for the welfare of others. If the well-read words of Philippians 2:5–8 tell us anything, they teach that Jesus lived for the sake of others. He maintained the attitudes of humility, submission, and sacrifice, and his purpose was serving others.

    So while “How are you doing?” is not wrong to ask, the question doesn’t go far enough. The real question for a disciple is this, “How are you doing loving the people God has put in your life?” The goal of spiritual maturity is not self-improvement. It is transformation into people who live to love others.

    This is a necessary corrective to the common way of thinking of spiritual disciplines. We practice spiritual disciplines so we can become the kind of people who love and live for others. We study the Scriptures so we to gain the knowledge, perspective, and guidance to help others. We become Christ to others in all the domains of our life. And in the process of living for others, we end up becoming mature people in Christ.

    Maturity is not an end in itself. 

    It is a byproduct of following Jesus. We keep our eyes fixed on him and follow him, and as a result, we grow. This focus rescues spiritual exercises from becoming self-focused, meaningless activities and is consistent with the teachings of Jesus. We never find what we are looking for by grasping at it directly. We find our purpose and joy in giving up our life, and by doing so, we save our life (Luke 9:23–25).

    *Quoted in Charles Marsh, Strange Glory: A Life of Dietrich Bonhoeffer (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2014), 384.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • How Wesley Prepared Leaders

    by Bill Hull

    In my previous post, "John Wesley, Disciple-Maker," we looked at several community modes that John Wesley employed to teach and equip disciples. An additional mode is commonly known as the select company, a hand-picked group designed to model what Methodism is all about. This elite corps of enthusiasts had worked their way through the modes of society, class meeting, and bands and were considered the crème de la crème. They had no rules, no leader, and no prescribed format, and they met with Wesley every Monday. Today we would call this group the organization’s DNA.

    Wesley taught this group the ladder of leadership, which was later used in pastoral training in Methodist Church. Continued of this ladder shows how Wesley’s followers applied his teaching, which was inspired and based upon the ways and means of Jesus.

    7 Rungs on a Ladder

    Each point below is a rung of the ladder. As disciples mature, they ascend the ladder and take on greater responsibilities.

    1. Street Preacher. When people are converted, they are expected to give their testimony in public. If they proved they are good at it, they can go to the next rung.

    2. Sunday School Teacher. When teachers can communicate simple Bible truths and hold interest in the class, they may advance.

    3. Preacher. As a preachers, candidates are permitted to lead worship and preach now and then. If the pastor is pleased with their performance, they are promoted.

    4. New Preaching Point. When candidates are sent out, their success is measured in an objective way—they must produce converts. If they can do sustain this success, they go on to the next level.

    5. Christian Worker. Upon application, candidates are evaluated and accepted as a Christian worker.

    6. Pastor-Deacon. Candidates are assigned an area in which they are expected to plant a church. If they do not gain converts and form a nucleus of a new church, they go no higher, nor do they he receive the title.

    7. Pastor. This is the last test. In order to be promoted to pastor, candidates must present sufficient evidence to the Annual Conference that they can leave secular work, dedicate themselves to full time to ministry, and be financially supported by the congregation they have gathered together.[*]

    Wesley believed that a leader’s primary function is to equip others to lead and minister, not to perform the ministry personally. In the eighteenth century, the clergy were a limited number of the cultural elites. Even though he was a member of that elite, Wesley’s system was open to common people who could work their way up the ladder. The system based on earned privilege—people had to produce to move forward. What would be the result if our churches were led only by those who had proven themselves effective in discipling and training others?

    Our contemporary, Western churches continue to tell people what they should be doing. But the model of Jesus and Wesley is all about people talking about what they are already doing. Wesley trained his pastors to measure their success by how the people they were training were actually performing the ministry, rather than by how they personally were performing the ministry. Can you imagine the revolution that would occur in our churches if this was the standard we used to evaluate ministry?

    Our churches are focused on getting people to come and watch a show. Jesus and Wesley trained people to go the world and introduce others to Jesus who had changed their lives.

    *D. Michael Henderson, John Wesley’s Class Meeting—A Model for Making Disciples (Nappanee, IN: Evangel, 1997), 152–53.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • John Wesley, Disciple-Maker

    by Bill Hull

    The industrial revolution in England began in the early 1700s. For those who owned the factories and mines, life was good. But beneath the belching smokestacks, in the shadow of the grimy mills, impoverished workers made up the vast majority of society. The ever-widening gap between rich and poor set into motion a powerful undercurrent, a brewing cauldron set to boil over in a civil war.

    One of the worst consequences of the industrial revolution was the horrific working conditions for children. Many began working at five or six years old, and one member of Parliament reported that children as young as three spent eight hours a day working in brickyards and would never see the inside of a school room. Alcoholism among the poor was out of control, even among the youth. In 1736, every sixth house in London was licensed as a pub. This epidemic of drunkenness eroded what little decency was left among the working class. Into this country in 1703, John Wesley was born into a large and highly disciplined family.

    Wesley's Younger Years

    Wesley’s father, Samuel, was an Anglican clergyman and a great scholar. John could read Greek and Latin by age ten and seemed on his way to a great academic career. His mother, Susanna, bore nineteen children, eight of whom died in infancy, and she is well-remembered for raising her children with great discipline. She called her method “the management of the human will,” and she passed onto her children the discipline of strict time management. This upbringing explains John’s incredible work ethic that made it possible for him to accomplish so much. Susanna emphasized that the children “methodize” their lives.

    John was admitted to Oxford University and graduated at age twenty-one. He applied for holy orders and was admitted into the priesthood of the Church of England. He became a tutor at Lincoln College, Oxford in 1729 and developed what became known as the Holy Club. Eventually, this Club grew into a movement called Methodism. This movement became the saving grace for the country, transforming a growing resentment in the underclass into striving for “social holiness.” The only kind of holiness Wesley would accept was social, meaning holiness that affected all of life—the way a person dressed, spoke, worked, and loved. In many ways, Wesley modeled what it looks like to be fully committed to Jesus’ command to make disciples and teach them to obey everything he commanded.[1] And it is important to note that Wesley used Jesus’ ways and means in his own ministry and demonstrated their continued effectiveness.

    How did Wesley use Jesus ways and means of discipleship? He developed three modes for growing Christlikeness in his followers.

    The Society: The Cognitive Mode

    Wesley’s first mode for discipleship was the cognitive mode, and to facilitate growth in this mode, he developed the society meeting, primarily times of Bible teaching intended to transform minds and hearts into God’s worldview (John Wesley’s Class Meeting—A Model for Making Disciples, 83–125). The aim of these meetings was to arm the general population with knowledge of God and help them understand truth, right and wrong, and the basics of healthy living. The meetings were held once a week at times that did not conflict with the Church of England’s worship schedule. Wesley was an Anglican, and he would die an Anglican priest. He never had any plans to begin a new church.

    The society was open only to those who agreed to Wesley’s covenant. People could visit up to three times and then had to decide if they wanted to commit. If they did, they were interviewed and if accepted would receive a ticket for twelve meetings that promoted cognitive growth. Wesley believed that transformed had to begin in the mind (Rom 12:1–2). There was no feedback or discussion at the meetings. But the message was clear: people who wanted to live for Christ had to commit to his plan and his ways.

    The Class Meeting: The Behavioral Mode

    Along with addressing the cognitive, Wesley understood that Jesus called for behavioral change, so we also must confront behavior and provide a path for obedience. So the buy-in to join the society was a commitment to cognitive and behavioral change. Members of the society were automatically included in a class meeting. Wesley didn’t care much if people had all their beliefs straight at first. He was convinced that if people started behaving right, they would begin to think right.

    The class meeting was considered the most influential instructional unit in the Methodist movement. Simple in its design, it was first developed as a fundraising plan for the Bristol Society. People would covenant to meet weekly with ten other people, and each member was required to give a penny a week. They had to attend the meetings, give the penny, and participate in the discussion. Just showing up when they could and speaking if they wanted was not allowed. Those who covenanted were held accountable.

    Each class of ten to twelve had an appointed leader whose role was to be sure the group met once a week to ask about the state of their souls. The group would advise, reprove, comfort, and exhort each other. They would also discern how they could help the poor. Each meeting began with a hymn. Then the leader would state the condition of his or her soul and give a short testimony of the previous week, thanking God for progress and honestly sharing any failures, sins, temptations, griefs, and inner battles.

    Visitors were allowed to come twice to a class meeting. But if they decided not to join, they were no longer eligible to attend. Also, those who did not join a class meeting could not attend the society meeting. At the end of each quarter, members were interviewed, and if they had not missed more than three meetings, they were issued a ticket for the next quarter. This method was quite labor intensive for the leaders, so to make things easier for them, no spectators were allowed. Everyone was a participant.

    For many years, Wesley fought off pressure from his friends to create room for “hearers only.” Sadly not many years after his death, his followers made this change, and it sucked the life out of the movement. Wesley understood what Jesus taught and modeled—that we need to set the bar high if we want to grow mature followers. We cannot give the same status to casual followers as we do to committed disciples who are leaders in training (See Mark 3:13–14; Luke 10:1–10; John 6:60).

    The Band: The Affective Mode

    While the society was open to all, the class meeting required a greater level of commitment. For those who felt called to be more and do more, Wesley developed a third and more intimate mode of discipleship, the band. These were voluntary groups in which participants were matched by gender, age, and marital status. The band was Wesley’s favorite level of community, and he expressed remorse later in his life that he had not begun more of them. They were his method for going deeper and training members for leadership who had expressed this as a goal.

    I believe the Jesus way is reflected in Wesley’s ways, particularly in the band. Wesley sought to provide opportunities to get people learning, talking, and then behaving differently. At the heart of each band meeting were questions that each person would answer:

    • What known sins have you committed since our last meeting?
    • What temptations have you met with?
    • How were you delivered?
    • What have you thought, said, or done which you’re not sure was a sin or not?
    • Is there anything you want to keep secret?

    Along with honestly answering these questions, a foundational principle of the system was active participation. In fact, this was the only real requirement for membership. The two reasons people could be expelled from the band group were unfaithfulness, meaning lack of attendance or commitment to the group, and dysfunctional behavior, both of which threatened the system. Wesley understood that ongoing disciple and accountability requires solidarity, and casual attendance is a serious threat to that sense of community.

    [1] Much of this Wesley story is found in D. Michael Henderson, John Wesley’s Class Meeting—A Model for Making Disciples (Nappanee, IN: Evangel, 1997).


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Phase One of Jesus' Discipleship Ministry - Come and See

    by Bill Hull

    The first phase of Jesus’ disciple-making ministry was a time for them to gather information and investigate. The disciples made a preliminary commitment and learned about the person of Jesus and the nature of his mission. At the conclusion of this phase, Jesus issues a challenge and gives the disciples an opportunity to think about what he is asking of them.

    Here are more details on this phase:

    • Text: John 1:35–4:46
    • Participants: John, Andrew, Nathaniel, Peter, Philip, and a few others
    • Time Frame: Four Months

    We pick up the story after Jesus was baptized by his cousin John the Baptist and spent forty days in the wilderness resisting the devil’s temptation. Soon afterward, Jesus returns to the Jordan and walks by John the Baptist who is standing with his disciples. “John looked at him and declared, ‘Look! There is the Lamb of God!” When John’s two disciples heard this, they followed Jesus” (John 1:36–37 NLT).

    Following Jesus required a certain amount of faith and getting the feet moving. After the two followed him for a while, Jesus turned around and asked them: “What do you want?” (John 1:38 NLT). Apparently, they were stunned at such a direct question. For a moment they fumble before they ask Jesus a question: “Where are you staying?” Note how Jesus replies. His answer is simple but will change their lives: “Come and see” (John 1:39 NLT).

    Notice also that Jesus doesn’t answer the question that is most likely on their minds, “Are you the Messiah?” He is not ready to tell them everything they want to know. But he invites them to explore who he is. In fact, he invites them to join him where he is staying.

    As the story continues, Jesus meets three others, Peter, Philip, and Nathanael, who are brothers, friends, or neighbors of the first two. What strikes us immediately is that Jesus already has some knowledge of these men. He first shows this knowledge to Peter. “Looking intently at Simon, Jesus said, ‘Your name is Simon, son of John—but you will be called Cephas’ (which translated means Peter)” (John 1:42 NLT). This is Jesus’ first meeting with Simon, yet Jesus knows enough about him to give him a new name, Peter (“the rock”). Put yourself in Simon’s shoes for a moment. How would you feel? I imagine Jesus’ knowledge of him played with his mind a bit because it likely indicated that Jesus knew something about Simon that Simon didn’t know about himself.

    Jesus demonstrates a similar form of knowledge of Nathanael. “When Jesus saw Nathanael approaching, he said of him, ‘Here truly is an Israelite in whom there is not deceit’” (John 1:47). This statement strikes a chord with Nathanael who is astounded that Jesus knows him. After Jesus speaks of seeing Nathanael prior to meeting him, Nathanael is convinced that Jesus is “the Son of God . . . the King of Israel” (John 1:49).

    Nathanael learns, as we all do, that God knows every detail of every person’s life. C. S. Lewis speaks of God existing outside of time and encourages us to think about what it would be like to have ten thousand years to review and contemplate every second of each person’s life. While God’s knowledge seems astounding, the fact remains that he knows us this well. God has the time, space, and the cognitive capacity to know each of us fully.

    This truth ministers to our deepest need to be intimately known and loved. Early in his ministry, Jesus demonstrates that he possesses this personal knowledge, and it seems to tip the scales and lead the disciples to trust him in ways they can’t explain or fully understand. This is an early form of belief, but the Jesus way of discipleship begins with his personal knowledge and awareness of his disciples.

    Come and See What?

    Since Jesus already knew these men, and this period in his ministry was designed for them to get to know him. This may seem obvious to some, but our churches tend to overlook this simple step. We often invite the public to “come and see” our buildings, listen to our singers, hear our preachers, and watch our liturgy. But this experience can be impersonal and more about showmanship than discipleship. Sometimes this approach is rooted in our doubts, perhaps the belief that what excites seekers is not Christ but the accouterments surrounding Christ. We want to convince the world that we are not dull.

    But in most cases, this approach won’t work. People know when they are receiving a sales pitch. While some may gulp down the snake oil, the rest are looking for something authentic, someone who knows them and who sees them. We don’t need to water anything down. In fact if anything, we need to be clear that we aren’t just messing around and having a good time. I’ve sometimes wondered what a sign in front of Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s church would read. Maybe something like, “Come die with us at 8:00, 9:30, and 11:00.” Being clear about the cost, about dying into order to live, is more authentic than talking about having your “best life now.” When we choose to lead others the way that Jesus did, we begin by asking people to come and see who Jesus is—his life, his death, and his resurrection. Who he is and what he has done will draw them in, because Jesus himself is the draw.

    What Does This Mean for Us

    Simply by being with Jesus for several days then weeks, his first followers grew committed to him. They didn’t fully understand everything he was doing or who he was, but they knew enough to follow him. Revealing himself is still his strategy today. People meet Jesus both in the Gospels and as they see him at work. When we love others in humility and serve them, we give evidence that Jesus still cares, still knows people, and still sees them. What does this mean for our evangelism? It means our focus should not be on inviting people to come and see who we are on Sundays and to enjoy the quality of our show. Instead, we must invite seekers into our lives Monday through Saturday and also to our churches on Sunday because in the ordinary parts of our lives, Christ shines the brightest.

    We need to rethink where we make the most impact, where we spend most of our time, and where our disciple-making efforts should be focused. If we follow Jesus’ example, we will naturally begin with the people closest to us who we have intentionally invited into our lives. When we let them get to know us over time, ministry happens.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Counter-Intuitive Leadership

    by Bill Hull

    Have you ever lain in bed at night wondering how you could make a greater impact for Christ? My thoughts are usually unrealistic. I imagine that something I write will spread virally and lead to revival or global transformation. I remember when President Ronald Reagan held up a copy of Tom Clancy’s The Hunt for Red October on national television and said it was a good read. Maybe something like that could happen to my book. Why not? Then I come back to reality.

    I share this because the first ideas typically reveal how I am a product of my American culture. My first impulse is to launch a large campaign. If I had unlimited funds, I could really get the word out. We need good branding and would use the latest technology. Or I think about ways of expanding my ministry and opening up new opportunities. We’d need to raise funds and get the right endorsements. The more successful the campaign, the more likely people will be to invest. That’s how we get the big numbers, right? But are these ideas where we should begin? To be clear, all have their place at times, and there is certainly nothing wrong with using tools or raising funds. The problem is in mistaking a million-dollar donation or a viral video on Facebook for true success.

    What did Jesus do? 

    He did what was counter-intuitive. He resisted Satan’s temptations in the wilderness, saying no to fame and the shortcuts to success (Matt. 4:8–10). He told people not to talk about his miracles (Matt. 14:22–23; Mark 1:40–45; Luke 5:15–16; John 6:14–15). At times he avoided the crowds. Just when Jesus was picking up some momentum and gaining popularity, he would withdraw to an isolated lace. When his disciples said he should go to Jerusalem, he didn’t.

    Jesus didn’t seem to care how influential or powerful a person might be, even though knowing powerful people who can make things happen is typically seen as an advantage to one’s career. Again, to be clear, I believe that fame can be used of God, but it can also detract from or even destroy what God wants done. Far too often, Christian leaders and pastors turn to celebrity influence to accomplish the work that only God’s Spirit can do.

    Eugene Peterson and U2

    Eugene Peterson was once invited to spend time with the world-renowned rock group U2. The band had been reading some of Peterson’s work, and they wanted to talk with him about it. But Peterson turned down the band’s invitation—for a good reason. He was busy finishing up work on the Old Testament translation of The Message. Someone pressed Peterson about declining the invitation, “Come on Eugene, it was Bono,” they said.

    “No,” Peterson answered, “it was Isaiah.” At that moment, Peterson knew what he needed to do, what was most important, and he made it a priority over celebrity influence.

    It’s difficult to resist the powerful pull of fame and success. Again, resisting it is not always necessary, but we need wisdom to discern when and how to use it. The world says that if we want to gain life, we must take control and make it happen. But Jesus said we will gain life by giving it up. If we want joy and happiness, the world says, live in this city, wear these clothes, look this way, and have these friends. But Jesus says we should serve others. He showed us that if we want to change the world, go small, not big. Take the last place, not the first.

    Like Jesus, Christian leaders must learn to think in ways that are counter to the ways of the world. When the spirit of the age tells them to substitute numerical growth for spiritual maturity, to be hip rather than holy, disciple-making pastors should follow Jesus.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • How Did Jesus Relate to His Followers?

    by Bill Hull

    The purpose of the Gospels is to tell the story of Jesus. Some calculate that Jesus spent 90 percent of his ministry time with his twelve chosen followers. That is a significant amount of time together! When I was a young teaching pastor studying the life of Jesus and looking at how he interacted with his followers, I found myself wondering, is there any significance difference between the different ways Jesus calls his followers?

    So I began to research and found that Jesus asked some to “come and see,” others to “come and follow me,” a few to “come and be with me,” and finally “remain in me.” On the surface there seemed to be a few small differences, so I read to find out if anyone had considered what they might mean. I was gratified to learn that A. B. Bruce in his classic book, The Training of the Twelve, notes a progression of calls.[1] Upon further study, I found that Robert L. Thomas in The NIV Harmony of the Gospels also discusses that the disciples’ commitment was a progression.[2] It just so happens that Thomas was my New Testament professor when I attended Talbot School of Theology in the 1970s. My first book, Jesus Christ, Disciplemaker, was largely based on my research findings on this question.[3] In that book, I provide the structure for how Jesus trained his followers. In this section, I will summarize what I learned and have taught for the past four decades.

    Sequential and Segmented

    As I researched, it became clear to me that there were three distinct periods in Jesus’ ministry marked by differences in how he related to his followers. We can see these periods through careful study of the Gospels. And as we uncover the sequential development of Jesus’ relationship with his followers, a clear structure emerges on how to disciple people through different stages of their growth. While some leaders teach a segmented and sequential process of discipleship, I find that the majority have not taken the process seriously. If anything the last twenty years, deeper skepticism or bias against systematic approaches has resulted in teaching designed to meet people’s needs or interests. While such teaching “in the moment” is helpful—for instance when you have a flat tire or need to unplug a toilet—learning in a structured manner has greater advantages. Let’s be honest. Even those who advocate a “felt need” or “as needed” learning approach start their children in the first and not the fifth grade of school. The majority of formal learning is still done systematically. Though this method is not the only way to learn, it is still effective.

    Both Styles

    In fact, I advocate both styles of learning for spiritual growth. Both proactive and reactive approaches to growth have value. We grow when the unexpected happens, when we encounter suffering and conflict, and when life doesn’t go as planned. But for this kind of learning, we must rely upon the safety net. We also need to be proactive, establishing a plan and process that is fueled by intention. Because of the nature of life, Jesus taught his disciples using both approaches. He had a plan, though it was probably not written down and carried around in a notebook. He clearly understood the dynamics of his work and how to prepare men and women to take over his work. They needed to understand it well enough to teach others and to believe in him enough to die for the cause.

    If you are a pastor or leader, I caution you not to be foolish. Don’t wait for the unexpected to provide your curriculum for making disciples. Instead, develop a plan that follows the lead of Jesus and intentionally train willing disciples to become the kind of people who will naturally do what Jesus did and react the way Jesus did. So how did Jesus do this?

    Four Phases

    Four phases mark Jesus’ discipleship ministry. I think of these as four key invitations.

    1. “Come and See”—An invitation to explore. This was the period when Jesus introduced a group of disciples to his nature and ministry.
    2. “Come and Follow Me”—An invitation to learn. In this period, the chosen disciples and other followers left their professions to travel with Jesus.
    3. “Come Be with Me”—An invitation to serve. During this period, Jesus kept his twelve called disciples with him and concentrated on training them so they could go out and preach.
    4. “Remain in Me”—An invitation to multiply.

    Jesus introduces the new relationship he will have with his disciples and how they will relate to him as they take over the mission of making disciples. He wants them to know they will have a helper, the Holy Spirit. They will not be left alone, they will have special power to fulfill his instructions.

    [1] A. B. Bruce, The Training of the Twelve (New Canaan, CT: Keats, 1979), 11–18. second edition published in 1871.

    [2] Robert L. Thomas and Stanley N. Gundry, The NIV Harmony of the Gospels, revised edition of the John A. Broadus and A. T. Robertson A Harmony of the Gospels for Students of the Life of Christ (New York: Harper One, 1988).

    [3] Bill Hull, Jesus Christ, Disciplemaker, twentieth anniversary revised edition (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004). Navpress, Colorado Springs, 1984.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Are Christians and Disciples the Same?

    by Bill Hull

    Given that for decades the church has separated discipleship from salvation, we need to ask the question: Are Christians and disciples the same? At first, this question seems to be about the meaning of words, but it is really about expectations. A disciple is a learner, a student of someone. The term implies action and obedience. 

    The term Christian, however, tends to refer to a status or position. Early skeptics used it largely as term of derision to describe followers of Jesus, and it occurs only three times in the New Testament.[1] For many, the primary requirement for being a Christian is agreement with Christian doctrine.

    A Christian is expected to be something; a disciple is expected to do something. When Jesus invited people to follow him, he asked them to “come and see” (John 1:39 NLT), and then later to “come, follow me” (Matt. 4:19). When Jesus chose the twelve disciples, his invitation was to come and be with him (Mark 3:13). These calls required an active response. The term disciple has a built-in expectation that Christian does not. Scottish writer George MacDonald explained this difference well: “Instead of asking yourself whether you believe or not, ask yourself whether you have this day done one thing because he said, do it, or once abstained because he said, do not do it. It is simply absurd to say you believe, or even want to believe in him if you do not do anything he tells you.”[2]

    What We Can Say

    We can biblically say that all who actively follow Jesus (disciples) also believe in him, and that their belief is sufficient to save them. Therefore I think it is safe to say that every disciple of Jesus is a Christian. But it is not always safe to assume that every person labeled Christian is a disciple, because a professing “Christian” who does not follow Jesus is no Christian at all. Some use the term “nominal Christian,” meaning one who is Christian in name only, to describe such people.

    [1] The first is Acts 11:26. The literal rendering is “the disciples were for the first time called Christians.” The other references are Acts 26:28 and 1 Peter 4:16. Some extra-biblical evidence indicates that “Christian” was used by non-believers describe followers of Jesus. But the term did not originate with Christ’s followers.

    [2] George MacDonald, Creation in Christ, in Guide to Prayer for Ministers and Other Servants, Rueben P. Job and Norman Shawchuck (Nashville: The Upper Room,. 1983), 60.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Discipline Isn’t Optional

    by Bill Hull

    If you read the Bible, you can’t escape its clear teaching on the importance of discipline (1 Cor. 9:24–27; 1 Tim. 4:7–9). Training our desires and will is important in the context of a community with other believers and that discipline is developed in two ways: personal and corporate. While some people are naturally self-disciplined, we can thank God that self-discipline alone is not the only criteria for spiritual growth. The vast majority of people I have pastored and taught over the years have started their spiritual growth with a form of corporate discipline. This group supports us and provides the structure we need for the discipline to be effective.

    Sadly, Christians and Christian leaders in the West have given significant push-back against discipline. They do not outright deny the importance of discipline. Yet they resist creating too much structure for community-based spiritual growth and corporate discipline. Typically, sermons focus on self-discipline, providing individualized plans for people to do on their own. Also, some churches have high expectations for leadership development, but do not pass this expectation down to the average church member.

    Why the resistance? 

    Well, discipline takes extra work. In other cases, the resistance may be an attempt to avoid looking like a cult or another religious group that places high expectations on its adherents. Some cults, to be sure, utilize corporate discipline as a means of control, but I don’t think it is wise to base our strategy on a reaction to an overreaction. Just because a group crossed the line in training students or church members doesn’t mean that we should reject discipline altogether. Our challenge is to find appropriate levels of accountability that create healthy change in people.

    On average, it takes at least three to four months to form a new habit. For that habit to take up residence in the heart and form the will may take even longer. Forming these habits requires a great deal of support, which even those outside the church acknowledge. Consider the process of escaping an addiction to alcohol, tobacco, drugs, or other destructive behaviors. The recovery movement understands the need for process. But for some reason when developing positive habits that lead to Christ-like qualities, we tend to downplay the importance of establishing a long-term process for growth. The behaviors we want to change may be less destructive than addiction to alcohol or drugs, or they may just be harder to see, similar to the difference between trying to convince a person with stage-four cancer to see a doctor and trying to persuade someone who feels pretty good to adopt a healthier lifestyle. Our challenge in convincing people of the need for discipline it is always harder to reach those who don’t see their need for help.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The Goal of Disciplining the Mind

    by Bill Hull

    In Conversion and Discipleship I establish that grace is more than just a passive transformation that God works in us. Here I want to dig into the goal of discipline. Discipline is also grace that enables us to learn from others, utilize our knowledge and understanding, plan and set schedules, and exert effort toward growing in godliness. But how does all of this relate to desires?

    We need to remember that all sin is the result of the good desires given to us by God turning bad. In other words, sin is a corruption of good desires. So for example a desire for power or for sex or to succeed can all be good in the right contexts yet devastating in others. When we exercise desires that are in accord with God’s purposes, they can honor God. But when we exercise desires for our selfish purposes, they are destructive.

    In addition, we need to recognize that many of our desires are set deeply in our bodies and as a result have a visceral power over us that can overcome our mind and the best intentions of our will. For example, a man can determine in his mind and will not to lust, or gamble, or lie, but his primal urges for sex, money, and esteem and can override his determination. This is why it takes time, effort, and discipline to overcome our sinful desires and why we must train our bodies, wills, and minds in godliness. Even as we mature in Christ, these visceral drives can remain unpredictable and dangerous. Paul speaks of them as the “sin that dwells in my members” (Rom. 7:23 NRSV), and we must not underestimate the power they have over us.

    The will depends on the mind to provide it with information. So what we put in our mind matters. Our minds are filled with thoughts and feelings, many of them subconscious, and they inform and effect our willingness to obey the will of God.

    I’ll give you definitions of the what I mean by the following terms so we are on the same page.

    • Ideas: beliefs based on our life experience and worldview
    • Images: concrete and specific pictures or memories
    • Feelings: passions and desires.

    The Goal

    The goal of disciplining our mind is so that our ideas, images, and feelings consistently match the will of God, because we are seeking to conform our will to his. In his wonderful book the Renovation of the Heart, Dallas Willard describes it this way: “spiritual transformation only happens as each essential dimension of the human being is transformed to Christlikeness under the direction of a regenerate will interacting with constant overtures of the grace from God. Such transformation is not the result of mere human effort and cannot be accomplished by putting pressure on the will alone” (41).

    Note on this construct of ideas, images, and feelings: It comes from Dallas Willard, Renovation of the Heart (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2003), 95–140. See also my exegesis in Bill Hull, Choose the Life: Exploring a Faith that Embraces Discipleship (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004), 107–26.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • The Importance of Desire in Discipleship

    by Bill Hull

    Over the years, I’ve found that people approach the practice of these spiritual exercises or disciplines in two ways: the proactive approach and the reactive approach. The proactive approach involves intentionally developing a structure of discipline and accountability. A proactive disciple has a specific plan for growth that includes specific exercises. For example, a person might decide to read, study, and journal through the Gospels in one year. Others may decide to covenant with three other people to meet at a scheduled time once a week to discuss questions, pray, and hold one another accountable.

    The reactive approach isn’t a planned or scheduled one but exercise spiritual disciplines in response to circumstances or to positive or negative events in life that lead to significant changes. If you are diagnosed with a serious disease or your spouse leaves then you react. Reactive disciples who do not have a proactive plan for spiritual growth need a safety net, which for most is their church community. They need to belong to a group of like-minded Christians in a local church who have committed to live a life that is pleasing to God. This needs to be a real, flesh-and-blood church, not just membership in the universal church. When real troubles and difficulties come, disciples need to be surrounded by real people who can offer real help.

    Beyond Survival Mode

    The reactive approach is the bare minimum, or survival mode for the disciple of Jesus. At times in our lives, we may find ourselves in this mode, just surviving and reliant upon the grace of God through his church. But we will only grow into maturity as followers of Christ if we develop and follow a proactive plan that promotes growth. So why is doing this so difficult for many people?

    I’ve found that the idea of having a training plan and exercising self-discipline to follow it puts people off. While they may agree that a self-disciplined life is good, they may have tried and failed or are intimidated by the work involved. Others believe that the disciplined life is for elite Christians, but not for common, everyday followers of Christ. Yet as we have seen, God expects every one of his followers to grow to maturity in Christ. And not only that, but to be contagious carrier of his message.


    I believe the kicker, so to speak, is desire. We can develop plans and put structures into place, but if we don’t really want to change—if we lack the desire—we will inevitably fail. In a sense, a very thing that must be transformed is the key to transformation. While the initial desire to be disciplined comes from God, he does not magically empower our change apart from our involvement.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • A List of Practical Spiritual Exercises

    by Bill Hull

    The Holy Spirit must begin our transformation at the level of our desire. But reading about this and understanding it is not enough. We must put our understanding into action. Similarly, if an athletic trainer explained the dynamics of human anatomy and how all of the training machines work, then tailored a training regime just for you, you would have useful knowledge to improve your health. But that knowledge alone would not change you. You need to use that knowledge to do the exercises the trainer prescribed for you.

    Just as we must exercise our physical body to develop strength and maintain health, we must do specific exercises intended to reform, inform, and train our mind, desires, and will. These are the “must have,” required, no-exceptions exercises of spiritual growth. Enabled by divine power, they make our mind and will into the weapons Paul says we need to wage war against the strongholds of thought that control us and sinful desires, temptations, and spiritual enemies. What are these exercises?

    • Worshiping regularly with a covenant community of saints
    • Serving others through speaking and working in the name of Christ
    • Hearing, reading, and studying Scripture
    • Confessing sin and prayerful conversing with God
    • Submitting to authority
    • Practicing silence and solitude
    • Intentionally living a mission that includes helping others become disciples

    Most of these exercises are not natural for us. It takes time for us to grow accustomed to them and make them into habits.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • The Importance of the Body in Discipleship

    by Bill Hull

    When speaking of the change process, we should notice how Paul emphasizes the importance of the body, particularly in Romans 12:1 when he pivots from the theological to practical: “And so, dear brothers and sisters, I plead with you to give your bodies to God because of all he has done for you. Let them be a living and holy sacrifice—the kind he will find acceptable. This is truly the way to worship him” (NLT).

    Nothing is more personal than our bodies. 

    They affect everything we do and relate deeply to who we are. We experience life and relate to others through them. People may know who we are inside, but they identify us by our appearance and voice. Christians have the hope of one day receiving a new body that will be perfect and won’t wear out. But until the resurrection, we must be dedicated to caring for the body we have been given. If we do not wash, nourish, rest, and heal our body, it will make us miserable.

    Our bodies are essential to our identity. When people think of me, they first think of my appearance—height, weight, and demeanor—and the sound of my voice or laugh. And the body has its own form of knowledge. For example, we don’t have to decide to breath, shiver, or sweat. We do these things automatically. The body also has great power that can be used for good or great evil.

    Our body can be either our servant or our master. Paul chose to use discipline to make his body his servant (1 Cor. 9:26–27). The body is not morally neutral. Because of sin, our body requires transformation. Everything from our posture to our facial expressions and tone of voice can become our ally or our enemy.

    An Altar of Sacrifice

    God knows how dear our bodies are to us, yet he asks us to put our bodies on his altar as a sacrifice (Rom. 12:1). If this image of placing your body on an altar seems unpleasant or strange, that’s because it should. Paul’s original readers were familiar with the altars in temples used to sacrifice and burn animals and other costly offerings to God or the gods. These unwilling animals were killed first, but Paul uses this image to call us to willingly participate in the process of change by giving up our body as a “living sacrifice.” While we do not physically die, this is not a comfortable experience.

    So why would anyone want to offer up their body as a living sacrifice? We give ourselves to God because of all he has done for us. We love him back with concrete actions, not just a rush of emotion. Placing ourselves on the altar and dying to self leads to our transformation into holiness and living in a way that pleases God. And unlike other sacrifices that end in death, this one, though painful, will result in life and eventually resurrection. Paul knows that despite the pain involved, we will do this if we have the right motivation and if the intention of our heart is good and true. There is nothing more worshipful than a willingness to give God what is most precious to us and to allow his Spirit to lead us into holy living. This is the worship that God seeks.

    More on Paul's view of the body in Romans: The air-tight argument Paul presents in chapters 1–11 forces the reader to admit that the only logical, rational action is to turn oneself over to God for service. If God went to all that trouble to save us, empower us, and make us his own, then he is the best one to tell us what to do now. If this is not your conclusion, you need to reread the first eleven chapters of Romans.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Mystical and Evangelical Spirituality

    by Bill Hull

    While there are many different ways of looking at the means of transformation, the forms of spirituality can be roughly divided into two camps: the mystical and the evangelical.[1] Generally speaking, mystical spirituality is rooted in Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy and sometimes incorporates Eastern mysticism and Neo-Platonism.[2] The works of Thomas Merton and Richard Rohr give a contemporary taste of this way of thinking. Evangelical spirituality, broadly speaking, developed from roots in the Protestant Reformation and can be read in the works of Rick Warren, John Ortberg, and others who emphasize reading Scripture, prayer, and other practices over mystical experience.

    We can compare and contrast the different ways these two forms of spirituality approach the process of sanctification by looking at various ways of understanding God and our relationship to him. We begin with the idea that God is separate and distinct from us, his creation. What is the goal of seeking God? And how do we know if we have reached it? Does a Christian mystic who chants or meditates have a different goal than a Methodist reading the Bible at lunch? The answer is yes. These two individuals mean different things when they speak of experiencing God. In mystical spirituality, the seeker and God are understood to merge into one. But evangelical spirituality maintains a proper distance between God as a holy other and the seeker as God’s subject. Whereas mysticism emphasizes God’s immanence (presence in creation), evangelicalism emphasizes God’s transcendence (separateness from creation).

    What the Difference Explains

    This difference of understanding explains why some in the monastic movement slip into the thinking and practices of Eastern mysticism. For example by the time of his death, Catholic Trappist monk Thomas Merton was considered the leading Western expert on Buddhist thought. Often, those searching for an experience of God end up leaving behind a transcendent view of God. Catherine of Genoa, a noted mystic, went as far as to say, “My being is God, not simple participation but by a true transformation of my being.”[3]

    We can see practical differences in the methods of prayer. The mystical tradition points to Jesus as an example of meditative and contemplative prayer. Their goal is to be at one with God, not to move him or change his mind but to merge their identity into his and to come into alignment with his person. Christian mystics tend to avoid petitionary prayers in favor of simple prayers that express abandonment to the will of God. The evangelical tradition of prayer is well-described by Karl Barth, “Prayer is wrestling with God, not meditating upon God. It is an attempt to change God’s will, not simply a passive resignation to God’s will.”[4] Evangelicals seek to engage with God as an object to which their prayer is addressed.

    However, both the mystical and the evangelical streams of spirituality capture elements of the biblical witness. For example, consider the anguish of Jesus’ Gethsemane petition. Jesus alternates between requests, yet his prayer is also mixed with resignation. It is an immense struggle, back and forth, between submission and petition. This prayer helps us understand why both schools of thought exist.

    Where Evangelical Spirituality Fits

    Yet in the end, I believe evangelical spirituality better captures the priorities of the biblical witness. In Jesus’ prayer in John 17, we clearly see him speaking to God about his work and making many requests on behalf of his disciples. While the prayers of Jesus contain elements of meditation and resignation to the will of God, they consistently emphasize the importance of making requests and expressing our own desires to the Lord. In fact if we take a close look at Jesus’ prayer life, we find that the majority of his prayers were petitionary and intercessory. In both Mark and Luke, he prays about strategy and selecting the twelve disciples. Jesus prayed about his work, asked for the things he needed, and made sure his Father knew what he was doing.

    I appreciate what Nathan Soderbloom says in this regard: “So much we may know with absolute certainty from all the Gospel tells of Jesus, that his prayer never was merely a state of soul attained by some sure method, or oratio mentalis, a Prayer of Quiet, a mediation, but an intercourse and conversation with the heavenly Father, an outlet for anguish and uncertainty and for questions that needed answer; the bursting forth of a tone of jubilation, a trembling yet confident intimacy longing for undisturbed intercourse with the Father in Heaven, although the feeling of nearness and fellowship with him was wont never to cease during the duties and occupation of the day.”[5] In other words, Jesus was not a mystic. He was clear headed and direct in his communication in prayer and with others.

    At the same time, we cannot completely discount the mystical element in our faith. Some things Jesus taught using metaphors aren’t easy to grasp. They have a bit of mystery to them. For example, Jesus uses the image of a vine and branches to explain his continuing relationship to his disciples (John 15:1–16). He told us to eat of his flesh and drink of his blood in Holy Communion (Luke 22:19–20; John 6:53–58). Identity doctrine in Scripture speaks of being crucified, buried, and raised with Christ and that we who follow Christ no longer live, but Christ now lives within us (Rom. 6:6–10; Gal. 2:20). There is great mystery in these things. But when we approach God, we must maintain the subject-object difference and remember that God is other than us. Radical mysticism seeks to dissolve this relationship. But God remains the holy other—different and separate from his creation.

    [1] I must credit Donald Bloesch for identifying these two kinds of spirituality. Much of my thinking was influenced by chapter 7, “Two Kinds of Spirituality,” in Crisis of Piety (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1968).

    [2] Neo-Platonism links Plato’s thought to religion or spiritual life. This philosophical school started not long after Plato’s death and was dominant in the Greco-Roman world. More on Neo-Platonism can be found at http://www.iep.utm.edu/neoplato/.

    [3] Quoted in Evelyn Underhill, The Mystics of the Church (New York: Schocken, 1964), 165, cited in Bloesch, Crisis, 100.

    [4] Quoted in Bloesch, Crisis, 109.

    [5] Nathan Soderblom, The Living God (Boston: Beacon, 1962), 59.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Growth and Reproduction

    by Bill Hull

    Discipleship and spiritual formation express slightly different aspects of the sanctification process, but they also reflect the common expectations that every Christian will grow and reproduce. Gordon Fee says, “In the long run, only disciples are converts” (Paul, the Spirit, and the People of God [Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996], 75). What Fee means is that followers of Christ prove by their actions that they have been converted into a new way of life. Proof of authentic faith is not simply a creedal affirmation but living the life. As Jesus said, “Not everyone who calls out to me, ‘Lord! Lord!’ will enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Only those who actually do the will of my Father in heaven will enter” (Matt. 7:21 NLT; See also Matt. 5:15–20; 1 Cor. 13:1–3).

    Yet today, it is rare to find pastors or churches who expect much from their members. Even rarer are people who speak of God evaluating us on the basis of what we have done. Instead in our efforts to emphasize grace, we fail to talk about standards and expectations. Some feel that these things smack of rigidity or legalism, or they find them to be unfriendly to seekers or uncomfortable for regulars. Not many churches expect their members to be knowledgeable of the Scriptures, nor do they honestly expect members to witness, bring others to the Christian faith, and discipline new converts to reproduce as well. Again, we have set the bar quite low. We do not expect growth, and we certainly don’t expect reproduction.

    More Than Only Two Aspects

    These two aspects of sanctification are not the only important matters in the Christian life, but I mention them because they are commonly neglected. Again, much of this neglect is due to the effort to extend grace under the guise of love and acceptance. Yet it is not love to expect less of people because we don’t want to put them under any pressure to perform. It is not grace to set a low standard that anyone can meet if doing so leaves people trapped in their sin and unable to grow. Real love takes action for the benefit of another, and it is not loving to expect less of people than God does.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • Sanctification and Discipleship

    by Bill Hull

    How is growth in holiness, sanctification, related to discipleship? Dallas Willard offers a helpful, organic description of sanctification that is similar to the biblical definition of discipleship we have been discussing. “It is a consciously chosen and sustained relationship of interaction between the Lord and his apprentice, in which the apprentice is able to do, and routinely does, what he or she knows to be right before God.”[1]

    Discipleship occurs when we answer Jesus’ call to learn how to live by his perspective and standards and become the people who naturally act like him. Discipleship describes our existential daily status as learners and refers to our identity. As discussed in Conversion and Discipleship, Dietrich Bonhoeffer advocated that we unify the theological categories of justification and sanctification into the concept of discipleship because he believed that discipleship is a more concrete concept of life in Christ. 

    More from Bonhoeffer on Sanctification

    Bonhoeffer’s best friend and biographer Eberhard Bethge, speaking of Bonhoeffer’s efforts to do this, writes, “[Bonhoeffer] tried to grasp the Reformed articles of faith, justification, and sanctification within the single concept of discipleship. Yet with his key formula, ‘only the believer is obedient, and only those who are obedient believe,’ he did not mean to question the complete validity of Luther’s sola fide and sola gratia, but to reassert their validity by restoring to them their concreteness here on earth.” Bonhoeffer later stated, “Justification is the new creation of the new person, and sanctification is the preservation and protection of that person until the day of Jesus Christ.”[2]

    Along with Bonhoeffer, I advocate that we recover a functional way of describing salvation that incorporates the Great Commission and the call of the gospel to follow Jesus. If we begin with a proper understanding of discipleship, we can then explain sanctification as living out discipleship.

    [1] Dallas Willard, Renovation of the Heart (Colorado Springs: Navpress, 2002), 226.

    [2] Eberhard Bethge, Dietrich Bonhoeffer A Biography (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2000), 454.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The Forgiveness Only Gospel

    by Bill Hull

    In my previous post, "The Six Gospels We Preach Today," I discuss what I see as the six most common gospels people preach today. Of those six, the most common gospel preached today focuses almost exclusively on forgiveness. The forgiveness gospel is quite popular because it is simple, explains the basic requirements for getting your sins forgiven and gaining entrance into heaven, and is easy to publish on fliers, brochures, and booklets. The forgiveness gospel tends to equate faith with agreement to a set of religious facts. This decision to agree is typically followed by a prayer or some other protocol, after which a person is proclaimed a Christian forever more. What is wrong with this, you might ask?

    The primary weakness of the forgiveness gospel is what it doesn’t mention. Often this gospel covers the important topics of forgiveness and grace. But makes no mention of repentance, gives no invitation to follow Jesus, and does not discuss obedience to Jesus that Scripture teaches is required for a life of discipleship. The result in practical terms is what some have called the gospel of sin management. By it you manage your sin rather than having your life transformed. This gospel deals with a specific problem—God’s judgment of our sin—by giving a specific solution—Jesus’ death on the cross enables you to be forgiven. How do you benefit from this solution? You simply make the right decision, say the right words to make the right confession, and have the right experience.

    Only a Little Blood from Jesus

    As Dallas Willard adds, “For some time now the belief required to be saved has increasingly been regarded as a totally private act, ‘just between you and the Lord’” (The Divine Conspiracy, 35–39). This gospel preaches a Christ who exists for our benefit alone. His only work is to redeem humankind without requiring any further obligation from them. This understanding tends to foster what some have called “vampire Christians.” They only want a little blood from Jesus for their sins but want nothing more to do with him until heaven. By its nature, this gospel cuts off any ongoing life in Christ because it creates a person who has confidence in heaven but no stake in living for Christ now. Tragically, when so-called Christians like this stand at heaven’s gate declaring by the gospel there is no reason to keep them out, they may find there is no reason to let them in (Matt. 7:22-24ff).


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Discipleship Resource of the Year: Conversion & Discipleship [Award]

    Every year Outreach Magazine publishes a list of the top Christian resources for leaders interested in outreach. The list is the “Annual Outreach Resources of the Year”. For this year’s list, we're pleased to announce that Conversion & Discipleship received an award for the resource of the year in the discipleship category.

    Get a copy of Conversion & Discipleship by clicking here.

    Conversion & DiscipleshipFor this annual list, Outreach picked top resources by category based on hundreds of submissions from publishers and authors from November 1st, 2015 to October 31st, 2016. The panel chooses must-read resources for pastors and leaders alike.

    They select a book in twelve different categories: evangelism, church, leadership, cross-cultural, social justice, apologetics, culture, discipleship, counseling and relationships, Christian living, children, and youth. Their selection represents the most important ideas, strategies and trends for that category.

    This year, Brad Watson, the executive director of Gospel-Centered Discipleship and pastor of coaching and missions at Bread & Wine Communities in Portland, Oregon, evaluated books in the discipleship category. As a representative of Outreach, he selected Conversion & Discipleship: You Can't Have One Without the Other as this year's top discipleship resource for pastors and leaders.

    In response to this award, Bill Hull says,

    "I want people to read this book because it deals with the singular issue facing American Christianity right now: what gospel do we believe in? Dealing with this question is vital because the gospel we believe in will determine the kind of people we are. If we're going to love the world as Christ loved the world, then we need to be increasingly more Christ like. The extent to which we become more Christ like goes back to the gospel we believe and what it naturally produces. In Conversion & Discipleship we teach that all who are called to salvation are called to discipleship, no exceptions, no excuses. By aligning with the Gospel of Jesus, we align ourselves also with the core mission of Jesus.

    “In the end, my hope is that the reader will more clearly understand what it means to live as disciples of Jesus. Following after Jesus means we are called to make disciples who in turn make other disciples. It's about multiplication, not just reproduction."

    Outreach Magazine started in 2002 in response to the growing desire among church leaders for more resources on outreach. They provide through print and digital publications leading ideas, insights and stories for Christian churches who are interested in outreach. Their publications feature speakers, authors and leaders like Andy Stanley, Francis Chan, Craig Groeschel, Dave Ferguson, Rick Warren, Ravi Zacharias, Bill Hybels, and many others.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here.

  • Three Kinds of People

    by Bill Hull

    The founder of Dallas Theological Seminary, Lewis Sperry Chafer, wrote an influential book in which he presented a theory, based on 1 Corinthians 2–3, that there are three kinds of people: natural people, carnal people, and spiritual people.[1]

    Natural People and Spiritual People

    Natural people are unbelievers who are unable to sense or discern the things of God. “The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Cor. 2:14 ESV). In contrast to natural people are spiritual people who we would consider believers in Christ. “The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. ‘For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?’ But we have the mind of Christ” (1 Cor. 2:15–16 ESV).

    Carnal People

    The third type people are what Chafer refers to as the carnal. “But I, brothers, could not address you as spiritual people, but as people of the flesh, as infants in Christ. I fed you with milk, not solid food, for you were not ready for it. And even now you are not yet ready, for you are still of the flesh. For while there is jealousy and strife among you, are you not of the flesh and behaving only in a human way?” (1 Cor. 3:1–3 ESV).

    To be clear, Paul refers to these people as “infants in Christ.” Yet he also says that he cannot distinguish them from non-Christians. Is Paul creating a secondary class of Christians here, or are these just bad Christians behaving badly? Or perhaps these are professing Christians who are not born again and are simply acting like what they truly are, non-Christians? It could be that Paul was giving these Christians the benefit of the doubt. But outwardly there seems to be no distinction between the behavior of carnal Christians and natural people. Both appear to be deaf to the things of God.

    A Secondary Class of Christians?

    In arguing for the existence of this secondary class of Christians, Chafer makes the following argument (quoted in Stanley, Salvation by Works, 63):

    The difference between the spiritual man and the carnal man is as follows: the spiritual man has “no limitation on him in the realm of the things of God. He can ‘freely’ receive the divine revelation, and he glories in it. . . . The ‘spiritual’ man is the divine ideal of life and ministry in power with God and man, in unbroken fellowship and blessing.” The carnal Christian on the other hand “is born again and possesses the indwelling Spirit; but his carnality hinders the full ministry of the Spirit.” He is characterized by a walk that is on the same plane as that of the “natural” man. In short the carnal Christian is controlled by the flesh whereas he that is spiritual is controlled by the Spirit. From this it follows that there are “two great spiritual changes which are possible to human experience.” The natural man must become saved, and the saved man—if he is fleshly—must become spiritual.”

    The problem with Chafer’s argument is that it ignores the reality that every true Christian has carnality inside that is potentially debilitating. All believers struggle with the flesh, but all have the capacity to overcome it. In fact, true believers do overcome their sin and produce fruit in a consistent way. Chafer’s classification of carnal Christian, one as who has a ticket to heaven yet is fruitless and comfortable with sin, opens the door for confusion because, simply put, such a person does not exist.

    What then is Paul saying in 1 Corinthians 3:1–3? In effect, he is telling the Corinthians Christians to stop acting like unbelievers. This is a pastoral response to sinful behavior that is similar to the rebuke we find in Hebrews 5:11–13, where the author calls these Christians “spiritually dull” and hard of hearing. He says they are “like babies who need milk and cannot eat solid food” (Heb. 5:12 NLT). This immaturity is a very real problem in our churches. The question is not whether such people exist but whether we should establish a separate category for them and make allowances for real believers who no longer repent of their sin. If we accept that the category of carnal Christian exists, we slit the throat of the gospel, and in accommodating their sinful behavior, we drive a stake through the call to discipleship.

    Carnal Christianity?

    Carnal Christianity fits nicely with the alternative vision of the Christian life. Carnal Christians can assume they are forgiven and that discipleship is optional. This is a form of cheap grace, or as Bonhoeffer put it, the death of discipleship.

    Carnal Christians make much of the forgiveness of sin. In fact, they love to hear that their sins are forgiven and see this as is the defining reality of being a Christian. But forgiveness detached from repentance and the call to follow Christ is not the gospel. A real Christian responds to discipline and changes to live and behave according to the standard of Jesus’ teachings. This is why we must include the call to discipleship in our proclamation of the gospel.

    [1] Lewis Sperry Chafer, He That Is Spiritual: A Classic Study of the Biblical Doctrine of Spirituality (Philadelphia Sunday School Times, 1918; reprint Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1967), 15–22.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Having a Saving Faith

    by Bill Hull

    In his short letter, James addresses the topic of faith and its relationship to works. At one point, he asks a question that is quite relevant to our discussion: “What good is it, dear brothers and sisters if you say you have faith but don’t show it by your actions? Can that kind of faith save anyone?” (James 2:14 NLT, emphasis added). The obvious answer to his question is no. Faith that never does anything is not a saving faith. James continues to illustrate his point by employing the example of helping those who are cold, hungry, and in need. A so-called faith that does not help the needy is “dead and useless” (James 2:15–17). True faith is made visible by the works it does. “I will show you my faith by my good deeds” (James 2:18 NLT). 

    When Faith is Real

    Faith is only real when it manifests itself in obedience to God and love toward others. James even ridicules an inactive, dead faith by comparing it to what demons believe. “You say you have faith, for you believe that there is one God. Good for you! Even the demons believe this, and they tremble in terror. How foolish! Can’t you see that faith without good deeds is useless?” (James 2:19–20 NLT).

    Martin Luther once said, “Christians are saved by faith alone but not by faith that is alone.” He meant that true faith would necessarily produce works and joked that while people were arguing whether faith produced works, those with true faith were in the streets doing good works. In this Luther followed the consensus of the Patristic Fathers.[1] Augustine made sure to link faith to works in his commentary on Jesus’ words in John 15:5, “Apart from me you can do nothing.”[2] Augustine’s point was that real faith is not passive but active. Real faith moves people; action is faith’s primary property.

    In his letter, James concludes by explaining how faith works, using Abraham as his example. Abraham confirmed he had faith when he was willing to sacrifice Isaac on the altar. James writes: “You see, his faith and his actions worked together. His actions made his faith complete” (James 2:22 NLT).

    What We Can Conclude

    So we can conclude with James and the church founders that a faith that saves is a faith that acts. Yet we must understand this truth in light of Paul’s words, “Salvation is not a reward for the good things we have done, so none of us can boast about it” (Eph. 2:9 NLT). Recall that the essence of the good news of salvation is that it is a gift. Grace cannot be earned; salvation cannot be attained without God’s mercy. “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our Lord” (Rom. 6:23 NLT, emphasis added).

    So whatever we conclude about the relationship between faith and works, we know that works even done in faith will not earn our salvation nor earn us merit before God. I believe that the best way to reconcile faith and works is to say that we are saved by faith, but this faith must be one that acts—a living, active faith that expresses itself in love. If it does not, we are not saved. As James reminds us, we cannot be saved by a dead faith.

    Problems in Our Churches

    Here is where we run into problems in our churches. Because faith has been taught as agreement to a set of beliefs or a praying a specific prayer one time rather than obedience to Jesus, our churches are crowded with confused people. Many think they are Christians and wonder why they have little interest in what their pastor or priest is telling them. Conversion for these individuals has never included Jesus’ call to follow him, and they have never been taught what it means to be a disciple. If discipleship is not taught as the normal calling of every follower of Christ, then we have a mess of people who see themselves with a ticket to heaven but view the Christian life as a collection of optional activities. Their faith is weak, if not altogether dead. If we think we will make Christlike disciples from a flawed gospel, we are wrong.

    [1] Most Patristic Fathers held that salvation was not by works, yet that no one can be saved without them. See Alan Stanley’s fine work, Did Jesus Teach Salvation by Works? The Role of Works in Salvation in the Synoptic Gospels (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2006), 20–60.

    [2] Augustine quoted by Stanley, Salvation by Works, 25.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • What Does It Mean to be Saved?

    by Bill Hull

    The Greek word translated “saved” and its synonyms primarily mean being delivered from something or someone. But salvation is not just a past experience. The Bible speaks of salvation as a present and future reality. While the modern, Western church primarily views salvation as a past event that begins a Christian life, the New Testament speaks of salvation as both an event and a process—a journey. 

    The Journey

    This journey begins with repentance and belief that are followed by a lifetime of discipleship. The ongoing discipleship journey leads to greater sanctification, and in the end, we experience complete transformation in the eternal state. Salvation, then, is much closer to the process of discipleship than our typical gospel presentations depict. 

    The following section breaks down several elements of salvation and sets them into the lifestyle of discipleship.

    In Ephesians 2:1–5, Paul speaks of our salvation. “Once you were dead because of your disobedience and your many sins. You used to live in sin, just like the rest of the world, obeying the devil—the commander of the powers of the unseen world. He is the spirit at work in the hearts of those who refuse to obey God. All of us used to live that way, following the passionate desires and inclinations of our sinful nature. By our very nature we were subject to God’s anger, just like everyone else” (Eph. 2:1–3 NLT, emphasis added).

    Sin Affects Each One of Us

    In Conversion and Discipleship I highlight three phrases in this passage that show sin is a problem that affects each one of us. Every person begins life in the grip of sin and under the control of the commander of the unseen world, the devil. We are dead because of our sin, and in our spiritual deadness we follow the desires of our sinful nature. For God to rid the world of sin, he must address its presence in each of us. One way of destroy sin is by destroying the world, which God did in the days of Noah. But it did not solve the problem because he saved sinful humans. We are still in the line of fire, or as Paul writes, “By our very nature we were subject to God’s anger.” Not only do we need to be forgiven of our evil deeds and cleansed from our desire to do evil, we must also face the consequences of our sin. Humanity is currently slated for destruction, along with all that is evil.

    In the midst of this depressing situation, Paul explains how God saves us. “But God is so rich in mercy, and he loved us so much, that even though we were dead because of our sins, he gave us life when he raised Christ from the dead” (Eph. 2:4–5 NLT). Paul introduces alternatives to death, anger, wrath, and sin—a life of mercy, love, grace, and salvation. That God shows mercy means that saving us and forgiving our sin are not something we should expect and certainly not what we deserve. By all rights, God should punish us for violating his house rules. Instead, he shows us mercy. Though all people are sinners who deserve punishment, God has offered an alternative to punishment—an act of mercy whereby sin is paid for by another. Christ paid the price, and God raised him from the dead as Exhibit A, proof of his ability to solve the death problem. And he extends his offer of forgiveness and salvation to everyone.

    Only By God's Grace!

    In addition, Paul explains, “It is only by God’s grace that you have been saved!” (Eph. 2:5 NLT). The fact that our salvation is by grace means that we are incapable of saving ourselves. What we need to remedy our sin problem is more than better conduct or trying harder. Given the right motive, we know that people can improve their behavior. Rehab clinics and peer pressure tell us that behavior modification is within the range of human capabilities. But it is one thing to change outward behavior and another thing to transform motives so they are no longer selfish and self-centered. The Bible is clear that we do not have the resources to change ourselves in this way and require someone greater than ourselves to do it.

    At this point, some will protest that none of us chose to live, and being sinful is not a choice we have willingly made. It is the result of our ancestors, Adam and Eve. Some say, “I never asked for this! And now you tell me I should be grateful that you are going to save me from a fate that I am responsible for but never freely chose?” But this response reveals our tendency to think of ourselves as individuals, apart from relationship to others. The reality is that our accountability for sin is like being born into a family. We may not like our family, but it’s our family. We didn’t get to choose the context into which we would enter this world. That’s just not something we get to control or decide.

    We can protest. But in the end, we must admit that Paul’s description of the problem is an accurate reflection of human experience. Though we may not understand why and how, we are accountable for the actions of our sinful nature and stand in need of God’s mercy and grace. We need to be saved from both our sinful nature and the consequences of the sins we commit, and from both the sinful world we live in and our personal slavery to the devil.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The First Word of the Gospel

    by Bill Hull

    As I show in Conversion and Discipleship, the gospel is the proclamation of God’s good news. The first word of the gospel, which is often overlooked, is repentance. In the New Testament Gospels, the proclamation begins with John the Baptist “preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins” (Mark 1:4). While Jesus had his own nuances, the Gospels indicate that he continued the preaching tradition that John started. “Jesus went into Galilee, where he preached God’s Good News. ‘The time promised by God has come at last!’ he announced. ‘The kingdom of God is near! Repent of your sins and believe the Good News!” (Mark 1:14–15 NLT). The first word of response to the good news that came from Jesus’ mouth was repent.

    However, the gospel begins as the story of God’s relationship to his people Israel and relates the fulfillment of his promises to them to send a Messiah, a savior who would deliver them and through them bring his blessing to the nations. In Acts, we see this historical background in the preaching of the apostles and hear the prominence of the call to repentance in Peter’s sermon at Pentecost (See Acts 2:38; 3:19; 7:2–53; 8:22). Paul summarizes his message in his farewell to the Ephesian elders, “I have had one message for Jews and Greeks alike—the necessity of repenting from sin and turning to God, and of having faith in our Lord Jesus” (Acts 20:21 NLT). The gospel begins with a call to repent from sin and turn to God.

    More on Repentance

    Though we discussed repentance in the last chapter, more on the topic here will be helpful. Wayne Grudem defines it as “heartfelt sorrow for sin, a renouncing of it, and a sincere commitment to forsake it and walk in obedience to Christ” (Systematic Theology, 713). In other words, feeling sorry about an action does not qualify as repentance. Genuine repentance includes both an emotional component and a corresponding decision of the will to make an about-face turn in the right direction and to change behavior. Paul’s second letter to the Corinthians speaks of the need for more than sadness over wrong doing. He says that he was not sorry for his first harsh letter because it created a productive sorrow in them: “Now I am glad I sent it, not because it hurt you, but because the pain caused you to repent and change your ways. It was the kind of sorrow God wants his people to have, so you were not harmed by us in any way. For the kind of sorrow God wants us to experience leads us away from sin and results in salvation. There’s no regret for that kind of sorrow. But worldly sorrow, which lacks repentance, results in spiritual death” (2 Cor. 7:9–10 NLT, emphasis added).

    As Paul clearly indicates here, repentance involves sorrow that leads us away from sin, and the process of leaving sin results in our salvation. So a necessary aspect of our salvation is real repentance from sin. While this repentance is an ongoing process, we can safely say there is no salvation when sin has not been forsaken.

    The Vital Importance of Repentance

    This is what I mean when I say that the first word of the gospel is repentance. No one can decide to follow Jesus without repenting. Assent to a doctrinal truth is one thing; it is another to forsake sin. Grudem writes, “It is clearly contrary to the New Testament evidence to speak about the possibility of having true saving faith without having any repentance for sin. It is also contrary to the New Testament to speak about the possibility of someone accepting Christ “as Savior” but not “as Lord,” if that means simply depending on him for salvation but not committing oneself to forsake sin and to be obedient to Christ from that point on” (714).

    Yet some have argued that repentance is not required for salvation. Their objection is that repentance in conversion is a form of salvation by works.[1] If the work of actual behavioral change is required for salvation, then by this human effort we somehow contribute to our salvation. In addition is a genuine pastoral concern that we are adding a stumbling block or an unnecessary requirement to the gospel. While we may need to address some of this concern, we need to be wary of the alternative—a diluted gospel that promises forgiveness yet demands nothing from us. This diluted gospel preaches grace without calling us out of our willful slavery to sin. It speaks to one issue, not being punished for our sin, yet leaves out God’s work with Israel, his law for living on earth, and his greater purposes in redemptive history. It also leaves out the call to discipleship.

    I am convinced that the time has come for theologians, pastors, and church leaders to turn this ship around and preach a gospel that calls people to repent.

    [1] The Lordship Salvation controversy in the 1980s was between John MacArthur in his book by the same name and some prominent faculty at Dallas Theological Seminary including Charles Ryrie and Zane Hodges. Ryrie and Hodges claimed that requiring repentance added a work to faith, while MacArthur claimed saving faith required repentance, commitment to a new life, and fruit to prove that new life was a reality. Some also teach that the gift of believing faith inherently includes the desire to repent. However if this is the case, why did John the Baptist, Jesus, Peter, and Paul include repentance as a requirement for salvation?


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The Importance of Defining Salvation

    by Bill Hull

    Salvation is a big word that covers a great deal of territory. We talk about the need to be saved, or we ask people, are you saved? But what does that mean? What do we need to be saved from? Why do we need to be saved? While we inherently know that humankind is in a complex conundrum of trouble, the great minds of the world have been unable to come up with an answer.

    God has provided an answer for us, but our churches also struggle with some of these basic questions. What we are saved from? What we are saved for? The popular understanding of salvation that dominates evangelical churches today has little connection with discipleship or life transformation. Dallas Willard once concluded, “Simply put, as now generally understood, being ‘saved’—and hence being a Christian—has no conceptual or practical connection with such a transformation.”[1]

    This is a serious problem. 

    Our understanding of salvation has been divorced from a commitment to following Jesus. Discipleship is relegated to the status of optional, an add-on to the normal Christian life. Many Christians today believe that if we would like to live closer to Christ, we should be more godly people and live a life of peace, joy, and goodness. That’s great. But in fact, people believe it is one of several options for those who are safe in the security of salvation. It is certainly not something for all Christians.

    What is the motivation for becoming like Christ when doing so is no longer seen as a requirement for heaven? People believe that getting into heaven is simply a transaction based on acceptance of a doctrine, irrespective of any behavior change. Being saved is being delivered from the consequences of sin. But all too often being saved does not lead one to become the type of person who actually wants to be in heaven, let alone someone who would enjoy it.[2]

    More on Defining Salvation

    The truth is that if we are saved by acknowledging belief in a specific doctrine, and yet spend most of our life ignoring God’s will and using him for our own purposes, we are unlikely to want to be in heaven. If a taste of God and a God-centered life is too much for us now, what will we do with a full dose of God forever? If we don’t like God nor agree with him in the here and now, why do we think our desires will change with a change of scenery? If we think that God will someday change us to like him and want to be with him, we beg the question—isn’t loving him now a large part of being a follower of Jesus? And why should we do now what in the end God will do for us in an instant?

    God wants willing disciples who love him and are eager to follow him. The notion that we can be saved without loving him is a plain falsehood (See Eph. 2:10). Yet this notion is the central problem we face in contemporary Christianity. Many Christians claim to be saved but have no interest in the ways of God.

    [1] Dallas Willard, “Spiritual Formation as a Natural Part of Salvation,” transcript of a talk given at Wheaton College, 2008, 19.

    [2] This is another way of agreeing with what Paul saw to be his task, “So we tell others about Christ, warning everyone and teaching everyone with all the wisdom God has given us. We want to present them to God, perfect in their relationship to Christ. That’s why I work and struggle so hard, depending on Christ’s mighty power that works within me” (Col. 1:28–29 NLT).

    This is an excerpt. Continue to follow this blog to learn more of Bill Hull's understanding of the meaning of salvation.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Specific Callings

    by Bill Hull

    Belief leads action. If we are not acting on our belief, we do not have true faith. To this point, I explore in Conversion and Discipleship (Chapter 2) how Jesus’ call to discipleship is for everyone. In various ways, Jesus invites anyone who hears him to follow him, and he gives no specific timeframes or tasks with general call. The call was often issued to the crowds or groups of people (See Matt. 16:24–27; Luke 14:25–35).

    But there is another category of calls to follow Jesus that we find throughout the gospels. These are specific calls to particular people. A classic passage of a specific call is Mark 10:17–21. Jesus told a rich man, “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me” (Mark 10:21).

    When we read specific calls like this, we can forget that Jesus was speaking to an individual in a particular context. Many readers have assumed that through his command to his man, Jesus was telling all disciples to get rid their possessions. But I argue that Jesus’ purpose wasn’t to convince the man to sell his goods but to get him to think about a level of faith and trust in Jesus that would enable him to leave it all behind and become a disciple. Jesus knows people’s hearts and their particular idols and strongholds (See John 2:24). In this specific calling, he wasn’t laying out a rule for all of us to give everything away. He was speaking to this man and his specific struggle. This call was what this man needed to do to follow Jesus wholeheartedly, but not necessarily what everyone else needs to do.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Constantly Learning

    by Bill Hull

    Jesus’ teaching led to a variety of responses from his followers.  Sometimes they complained, “This is very hard to understand. How can anyone accept it?” (John 6:60 NLT). At other times, they resisted or were anxious about what he was teaching. “They didn’t understand what he was saying, however, and they were afraid to ask him what he meant” (Mark 9:32 NLT). Sometimes they had no idea what Jesus was even talking about, and they would just throw up their hands. “Those who heard this said, ‘Then who in the world can be saved?’” (Luke 18:26 NLT). Clearly they often lacked faith or insight to grasp the full meaning, causing Jesus to respond, “You faithless and corrupt people! How long must I be with you? How long must I put up with you?” (Matt. 17:17 NLT).

    The first disciples didn’t always measure up. But far from discouraging us, this is actually good news, because it shows that being a disciple isn’t a state of perfection. Disciples are people in process who are still learning, still growing. They make mistakes. The first disciples help explain our own experience, and their stories provide comfort and encouragement because we know in the end, almost all of them produced great fruit. A developing faith is not a flawless faith. Discipleship is realistic, not idealistic.

    The Process of Discipleship

    Alan Stanley explains the nuance of understanding discipleship as a process: “We must be careful to distinguish between the call to be a disciple and the reality of being a disciple. Since many define discipleship only as the conditions laid down by Jesus in the Gospels, it is not surprising that ‘disciple’ has become virtually synonymous with ‘committed Christian.’ Yet as we have seen this was patently not the case with the Twelve and neither is it the case for the rest of the NT (227).

    This leads another statement we can make about discipleship: it is the ongoing reality of anyone who desires to follow Christ. Discipleship is not a one-size-fits-all process, and he doesn’t churn out disciples every hour like a widget factory. He calls all of his disciples, and he lays out the same demands and requirements. But he makes allowances for our individual ways of learning and uses our entire lifetime to develop our faith.

    We become disciples at conversion, when we answer the call of Christ to follow him. Then we spend the rest of our lives becoming in reality what he called us to be.

    Note: The first paragraph has been gleaned from Stanley, Did Jesus Teach Salvation by Works?: The Role of Works in Salvation in the Synoptic Gospels, 226.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Disciples Come in All Shapes and Sizes

    by Bill Hull

    We should notice that Jesus calls different disciples to different roles, and during his life on earth, disciples followed him in different ways. In the come and see period of his first four months of ministry, Jesus collected more followers that the twelve who became closest to him. Many joined Jesus for a time, even though they may not have been personally invited. Other disciples were marginal or secret, like Nicodemus who came to Jesus under the cover of night and Joseph of Arimathea who was a secret disciple. 

    True Disciples

    But they were still considered disciples. Thousands of curious people gathered to hear Jesus teach and pretended to be disciples, but left when the teaching or situation became difficult. (For example, Jesus fed 5,000 followers in John 6:1–15, but many disciples left him after hearing his hard teaching in John 6:60–70.) True disciples are those who continue into the Come and Follow Me period.

    After the Come and See period is the Come and Follow Me period, but this following has different forms for different disciples. While Jesus was on earth, many disciples left their jobs and homes and physically followed him around the countryside. But Jesus would sometimes tell followers to leave him or return home rather than join his band of disciples. For instance after the woman anointed his feet with perfume, he told her, “Your faith has saved you; go in peace” (Luke 7:50 NLT). He instructed a healed leper, “Stand up and go. Your faith has healed you” (Luke 17:19 NLT). When the delivered demonic begged to go with him, Jesus said, “No, go home to your family, and tell them everything the Lord has done for you and how merciful he has been” (Mark 5:19 NLT).

    Following Jesus in Different Shapes and Sizes

    Jesus left scores of people in small towns and villages behind him and did not invite them to physically follow him. However, they also became his disciples because they believed in him and followed his teachings in the ordinary terrain of life. These differences are helpful for us to remember, because the vast majority of those following Jesus—throughout history and today—are called to work ordinary jobs, raise families, and be lights in their communities rather than being called to leave home to become missionaries, pastors, or international aid workers.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Jesus Asks for More

    by Bill Hull

    What was Jesus asking from his followers? When he said, “Follow me,” what did he expect them to do? Once again, the answer is more straightforward than we might imagine. He asked them to leave their tax booth, drop their nets, and leave their home behind, and he implied that he would handle the rest. Jesus didn’t ask for a creedal recital or a formal confession. He asked for a demonstration of just enough faith to begin walking with him.

    The story of Peter and Andrew provides an illustration. “One day as Jesus was walking along the shore of the Sea of Galilee, he saw two brothers—Simon, also called Peter, and Andrew—throwing a net into the water, for they fished for a living. Jesus called out to them, ‘Come, follow me, and I will show you how to fish for people!’ And they left their nets at once and followed him” (Matt. 4:18–20 NLT).

    Mark’s account fills in the rest of the story. “A little farther up the shore Jesus saw Zebedee’s sons, James and John, in a boat repairing their nets. He called them at once, and they followed him, leaving their father, Zebedee, in the boat with the hired men” (Mark 1:19–20 NLT). James and John may have already warned their father that this might happen, since they had probably already met Jesus. So Zebedee was left holding the nets, but he probably wasn’t surprised. He knew the affect Jesus had on his sons. Yet regardless of what he thought, they left to follow Jesus.

    Did leaving behind profession and family qualify as “saving faith?” The truth is that we don’t have a nice, neat compartment into which we can place these men. We can’t say they were Christians because no church or organization existed at this point. All we can say for sure is that they were followers of Jesus and had much to learn from him at this point.

    Footnote: More on Come and See

    The Come and See period was about four months and is recorded in John 1:35–4:46. While this episode with Levi is recorded early in Matthew, it is placed after the Come and See period when calendared out in a Harmony of the Gospels, and begins the Come and Follow Me period as recorded in Matthew, which is about ten months long. For further explanation, see Bill Hull, Jesus Christ, Disciplemaker (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2004). Robert Thomas and Stanley Gundry, The NIV Harmony of the Gospels (New York: HarperCollins, 1988) is a good resource for seeing the stages of Jesus’ four calls to his followers: Come and See, Come and Follow Me, Come Be with Me, and Remain in Me. This four-fold call is derived not only from Scripture but was also noted by A.B. Bruce, The Training of the Twelve (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 1988), 11.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Three Characteristics of the Kingdom Gospel

    by Bill Hull

    In my post, "The Kingdom Gospel," I shared the nature of the Kingdom Gospel of Jesus. In this post, I’d like to draw out three characteristics of the kingdom gospel to show why it is unique.


    The kingdom of God grows by investing in a minority population. Jesus describes the kingdom of God through parables and claims that those who have spiritual insight will understand. Those who are not inclined to hear cannot understand. “For they look, but they don’t really see. They hear, but they don’t really listen or understand” (Matt. 13:13 NLT).

    Using a parable of sowing seed, Jesus explained how the word of God receives a variety of responses. His audience was observant Jews who were expecting a political and military revolution but who were not inclined to believe a rural, untrained rabbi. So Jesus told them that some who hear the message will not accept it. Others will respond but be lack luster, nominal, or casual. But the good news was that others hearers would respond and produce a harvest of their own, reproducing from a third to a hundred times as much (Matt. 13:18–23).

    We could argue the parable gives the impression that a majority will either not respond or will fall away and produce no fruit. So Jesus may have been implying to his disciples here that they should focus on nurturing the minority who respond positively. In this they would be following their Lord, for he spends his time where his efforts with produce fruit. The fact that he spent most of his time recorded in the gospels with these few men is evidence. As disciples of Jesus, we should not fret over those who refuse to follow him but focus our energy on responsive people who will grow.


    The kingdom gospel teaches us to obey God by living intentionally in the middle of diversity and ambiguity. Jesus uses another parable to liken life in the kingdom to a farmer who planted some wheat, but then weeds grew up with the wheat. The wheat and weeds were so intermingled that the farmer couldn’t pull the weeds without destroying the wheat. To get any harvest, the two had to be allowed to grow up side-by-side and then separated at harvest time when both were cut down. Jesus explains that the wheat plants are his followers and the weeds are the disciples of the enemy. In the end the angels will separate the two, and off to their respective abodes they will go, wheat to heaven and the weeds to life without God (Matt. 13:36–42).

    Following Jesus requires us to live next to those who do not believe or follow our King. It also means we have an obligation to love them as Christ has modeled for us. We are not charged with determining and declaring who is in the kingdom and who is out. Only an omniscient being is able to do this, and we are clearly not qualified. We are simply to live and love, pray and tell, and some of those weeds will develop ears to hear. The strategy is that if we live among them, we have access. The institutional church does not have the same degree of access or opportunities that its members have every day.


    The kingdom gospel reminds us that growth is slow but will ultimately permeate everything. Jesus uses two illustrations to explain how his plan is in all of life, a mustard seed and yeast in bread. A mustard seed is small, but it grows so large that it can provide birds with shade and even a home. This illustration reminds us of many Christians who started with only a helping hand but went on to build orphanages and hospitals. The mustard plant is like the Red Cross, or Christians who help when disaster strikes, or those with a Christian legacy.

    Yeast, of course, permeates an entire loaf. Jesus’ point is that like yeast, his word spreads in a quiet way, but once it does, it cannot be stopped any more that yeast can be removed from a loaf to keep it from rising. Like yeast, the King’s disciples must be worked into the middle of the community to have the greatest contact and impact.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The Kingdom Gospel

    by Bill Hull

    In my previous post, "The Six Gospels We Preach Today," I described the most prevalent gospels people preach today. Here I will focus on the one that I believe is the Gospel of Jesus: The Kingdom Gospel. 

    What we can call the kingdom gospel best captures the preaching of Jesus and the early church. This is the gospel first announced by John the Baptist: “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is near” (Matt. 3:2). Jesus preached this gospel as well: “The kingdom of God is near. Repent and believe the good news!” (Mark 1:15). Right up to his ascension, Jesus’ disciples expected him to establish the kingdom (Acts 1:5–8). The early church also expected this throughout the thirty years after, right up to Paul’s last days. “For the next two years, Paul lived in Rome at his own expense. He welcomed all who visited him, boldly proclaiming the Kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ. And no one tried to stop him” (Acts 28:30–31 NLT). Jesus promised that this gospel of “the Good News about the Kingdom will be preached through the whole world, so that all nations will hear it; and then the end will come” (Matt. 24:14).

    What is the kingdom gospel? It is the proclamation of the rule and reign of Christ over all of life. This good news began with his deliverance of ancient Israel and his promises to save human kind from the kingdom of darkness, despair, sin, and death through a Messiah. It is the announcement that the promised Messiah has come as Jesus, who is the long-expected king who will sit on God’s throne. Though him we have access to eternal life, and we come under his rule by following him and becoming his disciples. From him we learn how to live our lives to the fullest. The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we are Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male or female. Jesus came for us. He lived for us, died for us, was raised from the dead for us, and will return for us and reconcile all things to himself. Those who follow him will live in his presence, under his rule. Those who reject him will eternally exist apart from his loving presence, which is called hell—the best God can do for those who don’t like him or desire to be with him.

    How do we enter this kingdom of God?

    Entrance has always been the same. Jesus has invited us to follow him, and he is the entrance to the kingdom. So start walking! We enter by accepting him as our rabbi and our king. We agree to learn from him by following his teaching, submitting to his direction, and praying for his help and provision. As we do, we grow to know him and love him, and through the work of the Holy Spirit, we start to become like him.

    Mark Twain once said, “The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why." The kingdom gospel tells us why we were born— for the kingdom of God. The kingdom is the realm of God’s effective will, where his will is done, and it has arrived. His will is becoming a reality in the lives of those who follow Jesus and who make up his body, the church.

    More Than Forgiveness

    While the kingdom gospel speaks of forgiveness of sin and eternal life, it is about more than forgiveness, where we will go after we die, or how to get into heaven. It is about more than self-interest, and more than trying to create a better world that fits our political or religious perspectives. Unlike the aforementioned gospels, the kingdom gospel includes a call to self-denial. It is focused on giving ourselves for the sake of others rather than on becoming financially prosperous or satisfied religious consumers.

    In short, the kingdom gospel calls us to discipleship. Being a disciple of Jesus, learning from him and submitting to his leading and his teaching, is the norm rather than the exception or the option. It calls us to become apprentices of Christ and learn from him how to live our life as though he were living it. If he were a plumber, what kind of plumber would he be? If he were an accountant, what kind of accountant would he be? This is the gospel for real life.

    Dallas Willard speaks of the power of this gospel in his classic work, The Divine Conspiracy:

    If [Jesus] were to come today as he did then, he could carry out his mission through most any decent and useful occupation. He could be a clerk or accountant in a hardware store, a computer repairman, a banker, an editor, doctor, waiter, teacher, farmhand, lab technician, or construction worker. He could run a housecleaning service or repair automobiles.

    In other words, if he were to come today he could very well do what you do. He could very well live in your apartment or house, hold down your job, have your education and life prospects, and live with your family, surroundings, and time. None of this would be the least hindrance to the eternal kind of life that was by his nature and becomes available to us through him. Our human life, it turns out is not destroyed by God’s life but is fulfilled in it and in it alone (13).

    For the Ordinary People

    In other words, the kingdom gospel speaks to ordinary people and brings transformation to ordinary lives as people listen to and obey the teachings of Jesus. This is the gospel Jesus preached to ordinary people and related to their everyday experience. Yes, we need to remind people of the background story of Israel and include the apostles’ teaching. But the heart of this gospel brings us to knowing, following, and obeying Jesus.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • How Spiritual Disciplines Form Habits

    by Bill Hull

    When we start to train our mind to look at life differently, a great struggle will ensue. And if this training is not in the context of supportive relationships, we will probably fail. Lack of relational support is also why so many people gain weight back after significant weight loss. If they think it is a terrible loss to not eat chips, cookies, pasta, and ice cream, they look on these unhealthy foods with longing and miss eating them. Eventually, they go back to their old habits because they want to go back and think they need to.

    So like the goals in weight loss and healthy eating, the goal for spiritual growth is to form the will through the process of transforming desires and then through obedience to exercise good desires until they establish good habits and godly character. As Willard says: “We want to have a will that is fully functional, not at war with itself and capable of directing all of the parts of the self in harmony with one another under the direction of God” (Willard, Renovation, 156).

    Confusing Disciplines with Spirituality

    As helpful as spiritual disciplines are, they must not be confused with spirituality itself. They are not the basis for our relationship with God but simply practices that provide a context for him to work to transform us. I find it most helpful to think of spiritual disciplines as like the exercises we do to improve our physical well-being. Some disciplines will work indirectly like running, which changes the physiology of the body. The muscles burn energy, the lungs expand to take in increased oxygen, and the heart pumps harder. Over time (several weeks), the muscles grow stronger, the lungs have more capacity, and the heart’s ability to pump blood increases. The runner did not directly will the muscles, heart, and lungs to become better; this happened indirectly. The runner willed to run to attain the desired result but also gained greater general health.

    The spiritual disciplines work in a similar way. Let’s say that you desire to become a more loving person. You can’t command your feelings to suddenly change. But you can choose to take the actions that will lead to the desired result. You ask God to change your motives. Then like a runner, you begin a program of regularly praying, taking in God’s word, and worship him in a variety of ways. Over time, your heart begins to enjoy pleasing him, like many runners begin to enjoy running. You may choose to fast, transferring the physical desire for food to spiritual longing for a deeper experience of God and the nourishment he provides. Then you may choose to serve others by doing loving things for them. Suddenly one day you realize that you enjoy serving others and that loving others has become natural for you. Like running changes the body, your spiritual discipline exercises, developed into habits, change your character, which is revealed by how you act. You chose to keep at these exercises because God put the desire for change in your heart.

    Let me give you another practical, concrete example from real life. One fruit of the Spirit is self-control, the ability to do what we intend to do and not do what we don’t intend to do. Many people lack this ability. They cannot pass a pastry tray without having a taste, or pass by an attractive person without flirting. Often the desire for that food or person remains in their heart and mind.

    Jesus on Transformation

    In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus speaks of the process of spiritual transformation. The religious leaders, scribes, and Pharisees were focused on external behavior, ignoring the heart. But Jesus looks at the source of behavior, not just the outward appearance. He teaches that true godliness is driven from the mind, will, and spirit. For example, Jesus teaches that murder is the result of anger. If people are not first angry with others, they are not likely to murder them. So rather than avoiding the act of murder, we should focus on thoughts, attitudes, and feelings. Jesus tells us to deal with our anger, cultivate peace and love in our relationships, and forgive others who wrong us.

    Here is an analogy. If you are flying to Houston from Los Angeles, you don’t have to fly to Seattle. Flying to Seattle is not something you need to worry about. In the same way, if you learn to forgive others and deal with the root of your anger, you won’t need to worry that you will kill them.

    Lust provides another concrete example and connects to our earlier discussion about self-control. Suppose you are a man who meets an attractive woman, and you allow the image of her to take up residence in your mind. You can’t go through a day without thinking about her, having fantasies about her, and creating an alternative universe where you are together. You realize that something must be done to stop these desires. Our first impulse, trying harder to exert our will power, won’t work. You can’t command yourself, “DON’T LUST. DON’T EVEN THINK ABOUT HER!” Neither will attempting to obey commands and keep promises. No, the problem is too deep for these solutions. You need to address the source of your thoughts and the reasons behind your desire. The goal is to get to state were not thinking about the woman does not seem like a loss. You need to examine your longing and why you feel deprived when you don’t have what you desire. You need to bring the provision of God into that place of longing.

    The Remedy

    These situations are where the spiritual exercises and disciplines are helpful. The good news is that we have remedies to cure wrong desires! Whether our longing is for a person, food, a house, a job, or some other thing, the remedy is the same. Consider some basic things:

    • Begin by asking God, “Why am I longing for this person, thing, or situation?” Pray for help in discerning the source. Find another person you trust to talk with about it. Dietrich Bonhoeffer often spoke about how sin wants nothing more than to be alone with you. Sin is empowered when we shut others out.
    • Take a close look at your expectations and think about the consequences of satisfying your sinful desire. Often, we fail to think through to the end. So we need to ask what would it be like, honestly, to get what we want? Our dreams are filled with assumptions about the world that are not aligned with reality. Graciously, God will show us the fallacy of our dreams, which may have been fed by the values and idols of the culture in which we live. Also, you may have triggers in your life, unconscious ways of responding in which you’ve been trained to be dissatisfied with what you are or have. Remember that the enemy’s goal is to make us dissatisfied with what God has given us and to doubt that he loves us. The enemy wants us to think that God is withholding good things from us.
    • Be patient. Change takes time. You may ask why and then have to wait in trust for God to reveal the answer. In the meantime, practice what he tells you. Avoid the triggers and practice the antidote: remember that everything you have is a gift from God and learn to be thankful for what you do have. Focus on the good news of what Jesus has done for you in the cross and resurrection. Your mind will eventually change and inform your will. Over time, you will begin to want what God has convinced you is good. One day it will dawn on you that you no longer miss thinking about that person, food, house, job, or whatever. Its power is gone, and that is just fine with you.
    • Keep exercising the spiritual disciplines such as worship, service, Scripture reading and memorization, prayer, fasting, confession, submission, silence, and solitude. These disciplines expose our motives and bring the flaws in our character to the surface. Negative thoughts that have been buried for a long time and create destructive emotions will be exposed. The disciplines will provide the structure and context that you need for long-term growth and maturity.

    Continue to read this blog for more on spiritual disciplines and training.

    bill_hullFollow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Unsplash.

  • The Holy Spirit and How People Change

    by Bill Hull

    When George Whitefield was asked how many people were saved in a meeting where he had preached, he answered, “I don’t know. We should know more in six months.” Whenever the gospel is preached, we know that God works to convert people. But even Jesus indicated in the parable of the sower that we cannot judge if a person is converted by an immediate response (Mark 4:1–20). Outward appearances can be deceiving. Like in the seed in the parable, some people grow at first, but in the end they bear no fruit. Jesus teaches that we will know if people are true disciples if they bears fruit over time.

    In Conversion and Discipleship, I discuss how salvation is both an event and a process. We are saved, yet we are also being saved. But what actually happens within people to effect transformation? How do we change? How does the inward transformation we experience manifest in our decisions and conduct? The answer is to all of these questions is the Holy Spirit. This process of change can’t possibly happen without the presence and work of the Holy Spirit.

    How the Spirit Works

    The Holy Spirit is in the business of making us new people by transforming our mind and changing our character. The transformed mind informs the will, and from the will, we act. We all know this by experience. However, we don’t change by just wishing or praying it to happen. A simple exhortation to stop doing something will rarely make a dent in overcoming habitual sin. Some excuse their lack of progress by claiming they need more time to come up with a more profound insight or plan. But the brutal truth is that they use up this time in the same unproductive ways. We need the work of the Holy Spirit to change us.

    Keep reading this blog for more on this topic.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • The Six Gospels We Preach Today

    by Bill Hull

    So what gospel is preached today? Well, actually several different gospels. Remember, the kind of gospel we believe and teach directly determines the kind of disciples produced. If we are not preaching the biblical gospel, we are preaching what Paul would call a different gospel. A different gospel leads to a different Christ, a different church, a different Christian, and a different culture.

    I believe that six gospels are prominently taught today, and each creates a different kind of disciple.

    For example if you preach a consumer gospel that is focused on the religious goods and services available through Christ, you will create a consumer disciple. This kind of disciple is nearly useless to Christ and his work. Or if you teach a right gospel that is legalistically focused on measured performance, you will create a legalistic disciple.


    Most churches intend to produce mature, reproducing disciples, but this is generally not happening in reality. The answer is clear. We are attempting the impossible. We cannot create mature disciples from Christians who believe in a consumer gospel or a legalistic gospel—or any other gospel on the chart except the kingdom gospel. Trying to do so is like pushing a boulder uphill, because we are trying to get people to act in Christlike ways without correcting what they truly believe.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • Two-Tiered System

    by Bill Hull

    I've written extensively about the divide between salvation and discipleship, and here I want to answer the question: What has been the result in our churches of dividing salvation and discipleship? 

    In recent years, Christians have been divided into two categories. At the core of this division is the idea that salvation has two parts. First, a person receives Christ as savior. Sometime later, they submit to him as Lord. This understanding has led to the existence of a two-tiered Christian population those who are saved and just waiting for heaven and those who are serious about their faith.


    Practically, this two-tiered system has created an expectation that many Christians will languish and never bear any fruit or multiply thirty, sixty, or hundred fold (Matt. 13:19–23). Because we expect this, we create programs around it. In fact, we may intentionally avoid urging people to study the Bible and act on their faith because these discipleship activities can be interpreted as legalism. We call our church members Christians but refrain from calling them disciples because that term refers to a deeper level of commitment. The biblical terms used to describe believers—followers, disciples, slaves, and servants of Christ—seem much too serious for many church-goers.

    We need to reject this two-tiered system. We need to return to biblical labels and speak in biblical ways about the connection between conversion and discipleship and by doing so reclaim this lost understanding of salvation.

    For more on the connection between salvation and discipleship, stay tuned here at The Bonhoeffer Project blog.


    Follow Bill Hull on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This excerpt has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • What is the Gospel?

    The word “gospel” simply means good news. The word occurs over ninety times in the New Testament and is a translation of the Greek noun euangelion. Both the noun and the verb form, euangelizo, are derived from the noun angelos, which is often translated “messenger.” “An angelos was one who brought a message of victory or political news that brought joy” (2.107, NIDNT). We should note there is nothing inherently religious in the word gospel itself.

    The Biblical Structure of the Gospel

    The structure of the gospel is best displayed in 1 Corinthians 15:1–8, which serves as a helpful, concise summary of the gospel. Paul reminds his followers of the core message in light of the resurrection: “Let me now remind you, dear brothers and sisters, of the Good News I preached to you before. You welcomed it then, and you still stand firm in it. It is this Good News that saves you if you continue to believe the message I told you—unless, of course, you believed something that was never true in the first place” (1 Cor. 15:1–2 NLT).


    Paul reminds us that believing something and standing firm in it are the same thing. His words indicate that belief is more than mere agreement or intellectual assent; belief involves existential living as a demonstration of belief. Paul includes a somewhat cryptic phrase, “unless, of course, you believed something that was never true in the first place.” He may be referring to a belief in the gospel without the hope of the resurrection or to belief in a different “gospel,” one corrupted by his enemies or rivals. 

    The Origin of the Gospel

    Paul then speaks of the origin of this gospel message and its importance: “I passed on to you what was most important and what had also been passed on to me” (1 Cor. 15:3a NLT). He wants us to understand that the gospel is not his, something he made up or created. He does not have permission or authority to make up the gospel or to write his own version of it. The gospel is something that is received, passed on, and entrusted to others. It is not to be edited, adorned, or removed from its proper context, here referring to the resurrection. Receiving the gospel and passing it on—unchanged—is the only way to preserve it from corruption.

    The skeleton structure Paul gives us in this passage has three parts: Christ died, Christ was buried, and Christ was raised.

    1. Christ died

    “Christ died for our sins, just as the Scriptures said” (1 Cor. 15:3 NLT).

    “Just as the Scriptures said” is shorthand for the writings of the Old Testament. In particular, Paul is thinking of the predictions of the coming Messiah, the promises God gave to Abraham, David, and others that were fulfilled in the birth and work of Christ. When Jesus was born and formally began his ministry, he presented the full revelation of God to the world. My point here is to remind us that before Jesus died, he lived. Ninety percent of his time on earth he lived in obscurity—not exactly a strategy designed for impact. Yet in three short years, he rocked the world in which he lived and started a movement that continues today.

    Jesus’ death meant something far more than most deaths because of who he was: God incarnate. His death had greater meaning because of his godly heritage (John 14:1–14) and because those closest to him considered him sinless (1 Peter 2:22–23). In another passage, Paul interprets Jesus’ death to mean something that all Israel should have understood: “For God made Christ, who never sinned, to be the offering for our sin, so that we could be made right with God through Christ” (2 Cor. 5:21 NLT).

    When Paul proclaimed “Christ died,” he meant several additional things that are a result of Jesus’ death. Because Jesus was the appointed one, chosen by God as a substitute, he took the penalty of sin in place of all who are guilty by birth through Adam’s curse. Why God decided on this plan is not explained here. But we have the simple revelation that Christ died for us and that his death in some way satisfied God’s requirements for humans to be reconciled with him (2 Cor. 5:15–16; 1 John 2:1–2) A living Christ was both chosen and volunteered to give up his life. This is where the gospel begins.

    2. Christ was buried

    At first, this second point may seem incidental (1 Cor. 15:4). You might think, “Of course he was buried. Why mention it?” But Paul includes this point because it establishes that Christ really was dead, locked away in a tomb with a two-ton stone wedged against the opening and a Roman guard making sure no one would steal his body. Jesus himself claimed that he would be in the earth for three days and nights and then would be raised (Matt. 12:40; John 2:19). So part of authenticating Jesus’ words and life and establishing the truth of the promise he fulfilled is verifying his death. Yes, Christ was buried. He really died. And as we shall see, he was truly raised from death.

    3. Christ was resurrected

    “He was raised from the dead on the third day, just as the Scriptures said” (1 Cor. 15:4). Again, the phrase “just as the Scriptures said” refers to all of the messianic promises God made, starting with his statement to the serpent that the deliverer would strike a fatal blow to his head while he would wound his heel (Gen. 3:15). However, the fact that Jesus experienced a verifiable death and burial does not hold much meaning for us without the final act, his resurrection. And resurrection is only an abstraction without appearances and eyewitnesses. Paul chronicles Jesus’ appearances to Peter, the twelve, and more than five hundred others and explicitly states that many of these five hundred could verify to Paul’s original readers what they saw (1 Cor. 15:5–6). Paul even mentions James and himself as among those who saw Jesus after his resurrection (1 Cor. 15:7–8).

    These three points are the skeletal structure of the gospel. The remainder of 1 Corinthians 15 is devoted to explaining the significance of the resurrection and includes the fact that Jesus will one day return and subject all things to himself (1 Cor. 15:9–58). The resurrection naturally leads to the return of Christ, the consummation of the gospel and the believer’s blessed hope for the future.

    The Story Continues

    But the story of the gospel is not over yet! The good news for today is that because of what Christ has done, we will one day see God eliminate sin, free us from the distress of living in a broken world, give justice, creating a new, eternal world. These truths, guaranteed by the resurrection, should bring great joy for all who have placed their hope in Christ.


    Written by Bill Hull, whom you can follow on Twitter here and Facebook here

    This is an excerpt that has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

  • What Qualifies as a Theology of Discipleship?

    Recently I wrote about why we need a theology of discipleship. In this blog, I deal with another important question: What qualifies as a theology of discipleship in the first place? 

    Here’s my answer: First, it must address the relationship between discipleship and salvation. Present day evangelicalism gives little place to discipleship in its view of salvation. Our doctrines of grace tend to keep us from clearly defining what it means to be a disciple. We tend to treat the experience of conversion as something entirely separate from the process of becoming a disciple.

    This separation has led to a common problem we face today. People profess to be Christians yet believe that they do not need to follow Jesus. We’ve defined discipleship as optional, a choice and not a demand. (John Stott characterized the gospel as being both a “gift and demand.”) For many who call themselves Christians today, being saved or being a Christian has no serious connection with an ongoing commitment to being formed into the image of Christ.


    Though it was difficult for me to hear at the time, Dallas Willard had pointed out to me that my theology was defective in a significant way. At the level of the gospel itself, I had misrepresented what it means to be saved. You see, the gospel we preach will dictate the result; the content of what we preach will lead to the kind of person created.

    My goal in writing Conversion and Discipleship was not to introduce new ideas. I believe that a theology of discipleship already exists and can be found in the Scriptures. In other books, some I have written, this problem of separation is addressed in a chapter or two. But in this, my newest book, I face the issue head-on. So with fear and trembling, I’m going to lay it out for you to consider. I’m sure that my thoughts will be flawed and criticized, and that as soon as they are published, I will want to change them. But my goal is to start a discussion, and not just in academic circles. I want to see pastors and church leaders—those who are engaged in disciple-making everywhere—participate in this conversation. My hope is to help them better understand the theological basis for discipleship so they can better work to reproduce the life of Christ in others.

    Over the coming months, as I post on this blog, I will cover eight subjects toward a theology of discipleship:

    1. The Gospel
    2. The Call
    3. Salvation
    4. The Holy Spirit and How People Change
    5. Ways and Means
    6. The Church
    7. The Pastor
    8. The End

    For each, I hope to address the challenge that my friend Dallas Willard laid out before us: “For Evangelical Christians, turning around the ship of their social reality, and restoring the understanding of salvation that characterized evangelicalism from its beginnings in Luther and periodically after him, will be very difficult if not impossible. It would primarily be a work of scriptural interpretation and theological reformulation, but modification of time-hardened practices will also be required. Radical changes in what we do in the way of “church” will have to be made.”

    We’ll get started by looking at the gospel.

    This is an excerpt that has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship. Image credit: Shutterstock.


    Written by Bill Hull, whom you can follow on Twitter here and Facebook here.

  • Why We Need A Theology of Discipleship

    In the coming months I'll be posting content about the connection between conversion and discipleship. As I describe in my book by that name, you really can’t have one without the other.

    I propose that all who are called to salvation are also called to discipleship, and that there are no exceptions to this. Many Christians today, especially in the West, think they have salvation figured out. But if you were to ask them about discipleship, they might hesitate or look at you with confusion. 

    Discipleship? Isn’t that what you do after you become a believer? What does discipleship have to do with becoming a Christian? What does discipleship have to do with conversion?

    In the posts that follows, I want to show you that conversion and discipleship, while distinct, are really two sides of the same coin. You can’t have one without the other. But don’t just take my word for it. In this post and others, I will show you that this is what the Bible teaches and is what Jesus intended for his followers.

    Let’s begin with some definitions:

    Conversion: For our purposes, conversion is “theological slang” for when a person decides to become a Christian.

    Discipleship: Discipleship occurs when someone answers the call to learn from Jesus and others how to live his or her life as though Jesus were living it. As a result, the disciple becomes the kind of person who naturally does what Jesus did.

    A word from Willard

    A few years ago philosopher, writer, and Christian minister Dallas Willard was reflecting on the evangelical understanding of salvation and discipleship. Willard wrote in The Oxford Handbook of Evangelical Theology, “There has simply been no consistent general teaching or practice under the heading of discipleship among evangelicals of this period: none that would be recognizable as discipleship in terms of biblical teaching or of the Christian past . . . this most recent version of evangelicalism lacks a theology of discipleship. Specifically, it lacks a clear teaching on how what happens at conversion continues on without break into an ever fuller life in the Kingdom of God.”

    Dallas_WillardImage Credit: Christianity Today

    Reflection on Willard’s words

    When I first read these words by Willard, they went through me like a knife. At the time, I had written three books that laid out a new template for discipleship, so I had some skin in this game. I wondered what Willard would make of my modest contribution, so one day over lunch I registered my complaint with him. “What about my books, Dallas? You know, Jesus Christ, Disciplemaker, The Disciple-Making Pastor, and The Disciple-Making Church?” I remember Dallas pausing and then laying his big hand on mine. 

    He said to me, “Bill, I haven’t read all your work, but I don’t see it there.” Strangely enough, this didn’t discourage me. If anything, it made me even more passionate to address the problem. Dallas and I went on to discuss exactly what he meant by a “theology of discipleship,” what it is and why it is needed.

    Dallas has gone to be with God, and I no longer have the comfort of asking him questions at our leisurely lunches. But I have often thought of what he said that day. Now we see encouraging signs that the church is taking discipleship more seriously, especially among younger pastors and leaders. Victor Hugo reportedly wrote, “All the forces in the world are not so powerful as an idea whose time has come.” It seems that moment has come for discipleship. I think the time has come to craft a common language for the growing interest in discipleship. 

    At present we are using the same words, but we are speaking a different language. If we are not clear about why discipleship matters, what disciples actually are, the key role they play in God’s redemptive drama and how it is all tied together in the end, what the Holy Spirit has begun, will disappear into the theological mist of confusion. This is why we need a theology of discipleship.

    This is an excerpt that has been adapted from Conversion and Discipleship.


    Written by Bill Hull, whom you can follow on Twitter here and Facebook here.

  • Post Featured Image

    The Disciple Makers Podcast

    BIll hull is the guest on the first episode of “The Disciple Makers Podcast”.

  • Post Featured Image

    Polling Spirituality

    The nature of our therapeutic culture is to confuse how people are feeling about their lives with truth. Karl Bonhoeffer, the most famous neurologist at the University of Berlin in the early twentieth century called this self-absorption the " The bad fruit of people busying themselves with themselves." He just happened to be the father of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, one of the great leaders of that century. We all love to talk about ourselves, to think about our unique qualities and how special we are. This fundamental fact about human nature is why I am skeptical about pollsters asking the public about most things, especially about their spiritual well being. Just a couple of days ago a reporter asked Dr. Ben Carson how he was different than Donald Trump. Dr. Carson spoke of one of his favorite bible verses, an obvious dig at Trump for not having one when he claimed the Bible was his favorite book. Carson quoted Proverbs 22:4 " True humility and fear of the Lord lead to riches, honor, and long life. " The Proverbs are not promises, but wisdom that is generally true. The statement was coined by King Solomon who was known for wisdom and riches, but not so much for humility. Dr. Carson appears to be a humble man, Donald Trump appears not to be a humble man. But Carson said he has never heard anything that Trump had said about the Bible or his spiritual life. In other words, Carson came across arrogant, not humble when he gave his unstudied opinion about Trump, it was good TV, but a subjective statement that meant nothing. 

    Most polling of Christians about their church attendance or how close they are to God seems just as fruitless. Because the questions are subjective, the feelings are subjective, and the questions are all about how they are feeling. Instead of asking people how they are doing, how they area feeling, how much they like their pastors, churches, worship styles, youth groups, ask them this, " How are you doing loving the people God has already put in your life?" Ask them when was the last time you forgave someone, sacrificed a vacation to give money, sold a home to finance a new hospital, or returned good for evil? When was the last time you kept your mouth shut and didn't criticize someone you despise, that would be a survey worth reading.

RSS Feed